literally created capitalism and enslaved half of humanity to feed it.

That's one side of the equation. On the other there's the EU officially being a social market economy and USians would get an aneuryism reading some parts of the German constitution. Like "Property entails obligations. Its use shall also serve the public good.". Or that, going way beyond eminent domain, means of productions can be socialised without even having to prove social good. Expropriate big landlords? Berlin is currently in the process of doing exactly that.

And that while no doubt Europe is causing a lot of problems elsewhere by its sheer economic weight alone, there's also stuff like the upcoming Supply Chain Act, making anyone importing anything into Europe responsible for checking that human rights were observed. There is no fucking way in hell such a thing would even be considered by the Yanks.

You could seriously benefit not only from actually educating yourself on the history of where you're from, and of the systems you live by, as well the current history as well, since you're clearly completely clueless, but also from reducing your confidence in your ignorance. It's not a good look.

Tnx for the explanation, I did read most of Rousseau's work, doesn't mean I remember everything I read.

And just because I dont know this slogan, and you feel like I don't agree with you, there is absolutely no need to be condescending. Not very social are we now?

Also, you like to pinpoint only the worse elements of Europe, and you won't acknowledge Europe's socialist inheritance like here:

"The first modern socialists were early 19th-century Western European social critics. In this period socialism emerged from a diverse array of doctrines and social experiments associated primarily with British and French thinkers—especially Thomas Spence, Charles Fourier, Saint-Simon, Robert Owen. " .