722
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world to c/mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] rwhitisissle@lemy.lol 30 points 7 months ago

Crazy that you're the only person I've found in the thread that realizes this. Generational theory largely accepts that the concept of monolithic generations is reductive. Yes, people born in and around the same time can have shared cultural experiences, but the idea that those are what purely shape you ideologically or that you behave as a component of a monolith are ludicrous. And then there's subgenerations, microgenerations, etc. Just look at the sociological research of Karl Mannheim for a very complex discussion on the topic.

[-] StereoTrespasser@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Them's a whole bunch of fancy words for saying "don't generalize."

[-] rwhitisissle@lemy.lol 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Generalizing is fine and a useful tool in certain situations. In others, it's not, and can in fact be very harmful. It's also sometimes good to explain why you support one versus the other in a particular scenario. Y'know...because that's how conversations work.

[-] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 0 points 7 months ago

I found two more! Get em, boys.

this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2024
722 points (88.7% liked)

Mildly Interesting

15985 readers
93 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS