21

Still like the game, even if it did not live up to expectations.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Callie@pawb.social 3 points 1 year ago

It’s still a good game, it just sucks as a fallout game. Like, the dialog is extremely linear. You have 4 options (you had more in the other fallout games) and it’s almost always a “yes”, “yes 2”, “more dialog” and “no”. It’s likely changed to accommodate controllers better and have less lines for the player character, but it just sucks that’s it’s the case.

Sorta the same with the story bits. In New Vegas nearly every, if not all NPCs were killable and you could still finish the story

[-] ursakhiin@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

I understand the criticism of Fallout 4 and generally agree but I don't think the New Vegas comparison is a fair one.

New Vegas was built on top of Fallout 3 by Obsidian. It had the benefits of a complete game needing only a few engineering changes to accommodate it. Obsidian didn't have to spend nearly the amount of effort on assets and engine changes that Bethesda did and could put nearly everything into world building.

[-] hastati@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

Considering that New Vegas had a production window of 18 months, where Fallout 4’s was 7 years, I’d say it’s a fair comparison.

this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
21 points (95.7% liked)

Gaming

30579 readers
510 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS