118
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by SeventyTwoTrillion@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

Image is of German farmers blocking the road near the Brandenburg Gate in early January 2024.


The ruling German coalition - the FDP, the SPD, and the Greens - has been in dire straits since the war in Ukraine began due to their steadfast commitment to destroying their country as much as possible in solidarity with Ukraine destroying themselves too. Scholz is deeply unpopular, with a record low approval of 20%, and his party's approval is even lower.

The German left has been entirely unable to take advantage of this situation, with Die Linke fragmenting due to split opinions on what position they should hold on Ukraine, among other issues. As a result, the major conservative party, the CDU, has gained a lot of voters over the past couple years. Most worrying, however, is the gains that the fascist party, the AfD, has made - from 10% in 2021 all the way to ~20% today. A significant chunk of the vote is likely protest votes due to the lack of an alternative, but a vote for fascists makes you a fascist nonetheless.

Recent controversies with the AfD - including an allegation that they held a secret meeting discussing a plan to mass-deport millions of migrants in an obvious parallel to Nazi meetings planning to remove all Jews from the country - has recently slightly damped approval for the AfD. This meeting generated counter-protests and condemnation from many Germans. It was later revealed that the meeting might not really have happened as alleged, but it doesn't actually matter, because the AfD's stance is being increasingly reflected by the ruling coalition, who recently introduced a bill allowing faster deportations of rejected asylum seekers and significant new powers for authorities in that regard, including potentially the criminalization of sea rescue organizations and imprisonment for aid workers.

The German government is increasingly considering banning the AfD, with their anxiety and motivation to do so rising as the AfD maintains and improves its position as Germany heads towards elections in late 2025. There are intermediate steps that could be done, such as revoking state funding, but if that doesn't work, then the party might well be banned. While I will never argue with fascist parties being banned, this probably won't fix anything, as the underlying economic and social conditions that are fueling these electoral shifts in the first place are not improving. Germany, the largest industrial power in Europe, is mired in a recession, particularly a manufacturing recession, from which there appears to be no escape. It has so far carefully shepherded its natural gas resources to keep the population as mollified as possible, but this has come at the expense of industry. In a trend starting from July 2022, manufacturing PMIs are still well below 50, reaching 45.5 in January 2024, which indicates decline. I suppose if you wanted to look on the bright side, it's better than it was in July 2023, where it was a whopping 38.8, so the rate of decline is becoming a little slower.

And this is just the domestic stuff. Germany has also famously sided with Israel to support them during the ICJ genocide case, has kowtowed to Netanyahu as they bond over being Genocide Experts, and maintains its support of Ukraine, continuing to send military gear and money to be converted to scrap metal by Russian artillery - rather than spending money on doing anything about the cost of living. In the face of a historic economic downturn, it has only more fervently stated its desire to remain militarily opposed to Russia for decades.


The Country of the Week is Germany! Feel free to chime in with books, essays, longform articles, even stories and anecdotes or rants. More detail here.

The bulletins site is here!
The RSS feed is here.
Last week's thread is here.

Israel-Palestine Conflict

If you have evidence of Israeli crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against Israel. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA daily-ish reports on Israel's destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news (and has automated posting when the person running it goes to sleep).
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.

Various sources that are covering the Ukraine conflict are also covering the one in Palestine, like Rybar.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful. Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mkultrawide@hexbear.net 43 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

FT: Republicans prepare to torpedo bipartisan deal for US aid to Ukraine

Donald Trump trashes Senate bill, as rift in the party threatens to kill last chance to boost funding for Kyiv

A bipartisan deal backed by President Joe Biden to deliver billions of dollars in US aid to Ukraine along with stricter immigration policies is facing a widening groundswell of resistance from Republicans in Congress, posing a major threat to its progress on Capitol Hill.

The legislation worth $118bn agreed on Sunday by Democratic and Republican negotiators in the Senate could be the last chance for the Biden administration to secure new military support for Ukraine in its defence against Russia’s invasion — alongside other national security goals including aid to Israel and Taiwan.

It also marks a rare compromise on efforts to curb immigration through the US border with Mexico, including restrictions on asylum, which has been a rallying cry for Republicans and a political liability for Democrats throughout Biden’s presidency.

But the bipartisan dealmaking has been trashed by Donald Trump in recent weeks — and the frontrunner for this year’s Republican White House nomination moved to torpedo the latest breakthrough again on Monday, just days ahead of a planned vote on the agreement in the Senate.

“This Bill is a great gift to the Democrats, and a Death Wish for The Republican Party,” the former president wrote on social media on Monday. “It takes the HORRIBLE JOB the Democrats have done on Immigration and the Border, absolves them, and puts it all squarely on the shoulders of Republicans. Don’t be STUPID!!!”

Trump, a foreign affairs isolationist, has treated the immigration crisis on the southern border as an opportunity to attack Biden as he steps up his push to win back the White House.

Within a few hours of Trump’s post, the leading Republicans in the House of Representatives — which also must approve the legislation for it to become law — issued a joint statement saying “any consideration of this Senate bill in its current form is a waste of time”.

“It is DEAD on arrival in the House,” they added.

The bill’s first legislative obstacle will be in the Senate, with a vote expected on Wednesday that would require the support of 60 of the chamber’s 100 senators.

At least 12 of the 49 Republican senators in total would have to back the bill for it to move forward as some Democrats are also expected to vote against it because they consider the border measures too draconian.

But the criticism from some Republican lawmakers has been brutal — and appears to doom its prospects.

Mike Lee, a Utah senator, called it “a betrayal of the American people” on X. Even some Republican senators close to the party leadership, which endorsed the deal, were wavering or expressing outright opposition.

“I cannot vote for this bill. Americans will turn to the upcoming election to end the border crisis,” John Barrasso, the Wyoming Republican and third-highest ranking senator from his party, told Politico on Tuesday.

“Now that I have seen the text, I have questions and serious concerns,” said John Cornyn, the Texas Republican senator who had previously encouraged the negotiations. Katie Britt, a Republican senator from Alabama, said the bill “would not stop President Biden from continuing his radical mass migration agenda”.

Early on Tuesday, at least 21 Republican Senators had declared they would vote against the bill, meaning it would fall at the first hurdle — another sign of the growing number and influence of isolationist hardliners on Capitol Hill as Trump extends his dominance over the party.

The expected failure of the bill also marks the latest blow to traditional Republican foreign policy hawks and political pragmatists who backed the bipartisan breakthrough, including Mitch McConnell, the party’s Senate leader. His future as leader could now be in jeopardy.

McConnell on Monday appealed for Republicans to come around and back a package that would help the US and its allies “regain the upper hand” over an “emerging axis of authoritarians” in Moscow, Beijing and Tehran.

“Make no mistake: the gauntlet has been thrown. And America needs to pick it up,” he said.

Democrats and the White House have also not given up hope the deal can at least pass the Senate.

“The $64,000 question now is whether or not senators can drown out the outside noise, drown out people like Donald Trump who want chaos, and do the right thing for America,” Chuck Schumer, the Democratic senate majority leader, said on Monday afternoon.

During a trip to Nevada on Monday, Biden was asked how the bill would pass the upper chamber. “With 60 votes, and you’re gonna watch,” the president responded.

Its not 2022 anymore. Crime is out, immigration is in! Y'all ready to hear about the "migrant crisis" non-stop from now until November 6th, 2024?

It's funny how FT framed the title about being related to Ukraine, when this is pretty much all related to Donald Trump wanting to run on immigration.

[-] Coca_Cola_but_Commie@hexbear.net 41 points 8 months ago

This is so funny. You've got Biden going to the media every day basically promising to go to the border rifle in hand to personally execute migrants if it can secure the money for Ukraine and they still won't agree to it and act like there's some conspiracy to let migrants in to vote for Biden or something. It's a level of obstinacy that's becoming almost sort of admirable.

Has there ever been a faker issue than the border?

[-] PosadistInevitablity@hexbear.net 34 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

trump-drenched xi-gun-2 zelensky-pain

It’s beyond parody, imagine trusting the US empire holy shit lol

[-] mkultrawide@hexbear.net 15 points 8 months ago

To be fair, this is Biden's fault. He was the one who insisted on putting immigration reform into the Ukraine/Israel funding bill. The GOP didn't demand that immigration be put into the bill, and Ukraine/Israel funding would have probably been passed if it wasn't in there. This was Biden trying to be too clever and thinking that doing a bunch of ghoulish immigration shit would get the GOP to vote for the war funding.

[-] PosadistInevitablity@hexbear.net 17 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Republicans were already turning down Ukraine funding. This was Biden’s attempt to capitulate and scrounge any funding he could by giving them border concessions attached to the Ukraine war funding.

Trump took that attempt to capitulate and broke it in half.

[-] mkultrawide@hexbear.net 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I think they would have voted for the bill if he had bundled Ukraine funding with Israel funding without the border stuff. GOP talks a big game, but Biden is already saying he is going to veto a standalone Israel funding bill.

[-] BynarsAreOk@hexbear.net 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

To be fair though, if you look up Zelensky's actual interviews back at the start of the war he was quite open to negotiation and a peace deal. The whole thing was pretty much heavy handed, its not an issue of trust at all, there was no alternative but to accept the new deal as it was, the westerners said they would give unconditional support therefore the war must continue.

Not that he should be excused at all, he deserves the wall right along with the Nazis, but back then If he didn't accept he would have had an unfortunate encounter with a "Russian" operative assassination attempt which would even trigger a more rabid liberal response.

[-] PosadistInevitablity@hexbear.net 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Nah I don’t feel like being fair to a man who made his bed with Nazis. He’s a stand-in for Ukraine as a whole here.

hahaha

[-] ImOnADiet@hexbear.net 31 points 8 months ago

vomits in mouth crit...crit... ~critical~ ~support~ to the republicans in their desire to end the amerikkan empire over grabbing power thru satanic racism

this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
118 points (100.0% liked)

news

23452 readers
732 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS