205
submitted 8 months ago by amaki@jlai.lu to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

IRCv3 doesn't bring multimedia as far as I know. There are good changes to the protocol proposed, but they are moving too slow.

[-] poVoq@slrpnk.net 9 points 8 months ago

This would require an HTML image upload service, which is out of scope for IRCv3 protocol specs.

But nothing stops a server implementation from providing this, and as already said several client+bouncer combinations already support media uploads very well.

The slow moving isn't the problem of the IRCv3 specs, the issue is the adoption by the large networks and subsequently the clients (which rarely implement features the vast majority of their users on the large networks can't use).

[-] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Yeah, I'd assume there would be a level of resistance to changes from big networks.

this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2024
205 points (99.5% liked)

Open Source

31021 readers
645 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS