59
submitted 6 months ago by brisk@aussie.zone to c/technology@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Bitrot 16 points 6 months ago

It’s a win for Apple, but isn’t it also sort of a loss because they’re not popular enough to count?

[-] petrescatraian@libranet.de 7 points 6 months ago

@Bitrot Kinda like that. Most friends of mine don't even own an iPhone. Those who do, generally use Facebook Messenger to speak to each other. If anyone is not on Facebook, they are surely on WhatsApp, or they can be reached via the classical phone calls and SMS messages (but I've yet to meet someone who I need to use these with, as they are clearly inconvenient as hell). If there's a group chat, it is generally on WhatsApp.

I heard Telegram is popular as well in the post-soviet space. It is my fallback as well, and I'm not in one. Plenty of Romanian channels (news or organizations), and I speak with a couple of friends from there. I realize this is just "a different WhatsApp" from the POV of a centralized silo, but the features are great and I'd clearly trust Telegram more than Meta.
@brisk

[-] And009@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 6 months ago

I've always had android and never had any iMessage issues since whatsapp, telegram etc are much more popular here

[-] petrescatraian@libranet.de 1 points 6 months ago

@And009 yea, WhatsApp and other Meta products are especially so ubiquitous.

[-] And009@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 6 months ago

Hope signal becomes the default or brings in some kind of support without the meta tracking

[-] BmeBenji@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago

The government labeling something that Apple fans love as “not needing regulation” is purely a win for Apple. Imagine if 99% of text messages sent were via iMessage, and the EU kept the same ruling. That means that Apple has a functioning monopoly that is not considered a monopoly because there’s technically an alternative.

[-] sanzky@beehaw.org 5 points 6 months ago

Imagine if 99% of text messages sent were via iMessage, and the EU kept the same ruling.

If 99% of messages were sent via iMessage the ruling would have been different. if it ever fulfils the criteria needed to be considered gatekeepers, then they will be designed as such.

[-] BmeBenji@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

I’m sure the rule would be different. My point was mostly to say this is in no way bad for Apple

[-] Norgur@kbin.social 1 points 6 months ago

It's not bad for apple, but iMessage is so irrelevant here in Germany, even the most die hard Apple fans will use WhatsApp no matter what.

[-] kindenough@kbin.social 1 points 6 months ago

Same here in the Netherlands. All the people I know with an iPhone use Whatsapp. I only use the standard app to read incoming SMS.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

A loss for European consumers, you mean.

Apple would rather a hit to their ego than a legal restriction anywhere. A little marketing can fix the former, but the latter can be permanent and fatal.

[-] BumbleBeeButt@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 months ago

Yes, my thoughts.

this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2024
59 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37443 readers
336 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS