368

Broadcom-owned VMware kills the free version of ESXi virtualization software (arstechnica.com)

submitted 6 months ago by GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

77 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Since Broadcom's $61 billion acquisition of VMware closed in November 2023, Broadcom has been charging ahead with major changes to the company's personnel and products. In December, Broadcom began laying off thousands of employees and stopped selling perpetually licensed versions of VMware products, pushing its customers toward more stable and lucrative software subscriptions instead. In January, it ended its partner programs, potentially disrupting sales and service for many users of its products.

This week, Broadcom is making a change that is smaller in scale but possibly more relevant for home users of its products: The free version of VMware's vSphere Hypervisor, also known as ESXi, is being discontinued.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 months ago

SMBs are not the target. Companies with a sizeable vSAN investment, huge amounts of VMware based automation and the fortune 1000 are. MSRP on the cheap license is going to be around $275/core, minimum 16 cores per socket.

[-] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago

And a potential 90% discount for big customers?

[-] signalsayge@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

Probably not that deep. I've heard there are definitely discounts. That doesn't count for much though when it still increases your cost 6x.

[-] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Shockingly, no.

[-] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 0 points 6 months ago

That's simply short sighted.

So they ignore the Fortune 1000+1 (the up-and-coming 1000). They also stop providing a learning/familiarity path.

I'm already seeing SMBs looking at KVM, Proxmox, Xen, etc. When these young engineers/managers/architects grow and move to Enterprise, what are they going to recommend when VMware is $300/core?

I'm all for (as in I push) recognizing the value of (even expensive) licensing when it reduces engineering costs and complexity, but that's what I'd call a "metric shitload".

A mid-size business could easily justify transitioning to just about any other VM solution when faced with that kind of increase. One 16-core host is now $5k in licensing, practically doubling the cost - and that's an annual cost for years - saddling "future IT" with that cost that can now no longer be invested elsewhere.

Now imagine you have 10 such boxes.

this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024

368 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

57226 readers

4186 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS