403
submitted 11 months ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/funny@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 3 points 11 months ago

Im sure we can argue semantics here about reprocessing the stuff, eternal not actually being eternal and so forth, doesn’t really change much.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It does change everything, when people fear nuclear waste, they talk about literally eternal. Otherwise we could say that reforestation is not possible, because it takes 70 years (if you are not just growing wood for fuel, furniture and mulch, but restoring a system).

If it's not literally eternal, then it's a working cycle which can be used and be more efficient.

EDIT: I've realized that the thing I'm remembering was written about fast-neutron reactors, which most are not, so you are right usually. It's actually funny that Russia makes more ecologically clean reactors than USA. Stupid, but funny.

this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2024
403 points (87.5% liked)

Share Funny Videos, Images, Memes, Quotes and more

2520 readers
148 users here now

#funny

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS