562
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SparrowRanjitScaur@lemmy.world 30 points 9 months ago

I don't get this point. I feel like Biden's done a great job as president so far. He's had a lot of tough issues to deal with as president and so far he's handled everything really well.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

it might be wise to end those behaviors and policies that have human rights advocates concerned.

I don’t get this point.

Don't play stupid; you know exactly what the grandparent commenter is talking about.

[-] SparrowRanjitScaur@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I understand that it was about the Israel/Hamas conflict. And I understand that many people disagree with the US supporting Israel and the way things have played out so far in Gaza. I wish the US would not get involved in conflicts in that region, but to me a single international policy isn't enough to negate all of the good that I feel Biden has done during his presidency. I also believe that any Israelis that have committed war crimes should be held accountable.

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net 6 points 9 months ago

Also, it's extremely stupid to say "I don't like how this person is handling the situation, so I will trust the person who wants to make it worse"

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-israel-gaza-finish-problem-rcna141905

[-] Diotima@kbin.social -3 points 9 months ago

Or you know, vote for someone who wouldn't support it in the first place...which you could do if the DNC didn't collude with fascists to keep alternative voices silenced.

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net 4 points 9 months ago

Ranked choice voting would also fix it

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Ranked choice voting would also fix it

This. Be sure to ask every elected official you've ever see about this, bring it to the forefront of their consciousness.

[-] Diotima@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago

Reducing a systematic campaign of ethnic cleansing to an "international policy" is gross.

[-] Diotima@kbin.social -5 points 9 months ago

It's interesting how wilfully ignorant people get when the data doesn't support their candidate. I should be angry, but at this point it's become so comical that I have to laugh.

[-] SparrowRanjitScaur@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago
[-] retrieval4558@mander.xyz 14 points 9 months ago

He's done an OK job for a run of the mill president during run of the mill times, but in my opinion he has failed to rise to the big threats of today, especially RAPIDLY encroaching fascism, climate change, and nearly catastrophic wealth inequality.

[-] CatfishSushi@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago

So our choice is between run-of-the-mill president or a guy who says he wants to a dictator, violently tried to overturn the last election, had fake electors etc. etc.

I'm not excited about Biden but the choice seems to be pretty straightforward and I'll be SURE to get to the polls.

[-] retrieval4558@mander.xyz 0 points 9 months ago

I'm on board with voting for him as a means of harm reduction but I'm also not gonna pretend he's been great like a lot of blue maga liberals claim.

[-] retrieval4558@mander.xyz 1 points 9 months ago

Lol the downvotes. I said I'm voting for the guy, but y'all are so mad that I'm not going to dickride him as well.

[-] Eccitaze@yiffit.net 2 points 9 months ago

Meh, I upvoted you. I personally think he's been about as good a president as someone could hope for, which is a pretty fucking low bar, but I still voted uncommitted in my primary yesterday even though I would crawl over broken glass to vote against Trump in November. I don't blame anybody who holds their nose and votes as a pure harm reduction measure.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago

I’m not excited about Biden but the choice seems to be pretty straightforward and I’ll be SURE to get to the polls.

I will be getting to the polls as well but it won't be to reward Moderates for picking a shit candidate and threatening not to back him every time there's an opportunity for him to compromise with leftists and progressives.

[-] Eccitaze@yiffit.net 2 points 9 months ago

Trump will make sure to thank you for your efforts getting him elected.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

When moderates are ready to compromise I'll be here. We've done our part, it's time for them to hold up their end of the bargain.

[-] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

The president has little power to address climate change/wealth inequality on his own. That all relates to the budget and is firmly in control of congress. Replace Manchin/Sinema with two progressive senators and you would have the BBB bill, which would have addressed both these concerns.

With respect to encroaching racism I am just not sure what any politician can do about it. Ideally, you would like to change the mind of hardcore Republicans, but it’s not like they are listening.

[-] retrieval4558@mander.xyz 2 points 9 months ago

Encroaching *fascism. I agree there's probably not much to do about racism.

[-] cybersandwich@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Most underrated President of all time. (Best president of my time at least).

I will donate the closer it gets and to the key races.

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

I agree but not everyone votes because of these things. It's 8 months away. Lots of stuff can come out from today until then to change a voter's mind. They could literally vote for whatever they feel matters.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

Lots of stuff can come out from today until then to change a voter’s mind.

Yes lots of stuff could but we all know Biden won't do those things. He's demonstrated zero regard for the opinions of people who helped him get elected in the 2020 general.

this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
562 points (94.5% liked)

politics

19241 readers
1874 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS