191
submitted 5 months ago by redfox@infosec.pub to c/world@lemmy.world

Not sure if this was already posted.

The article describes the referenced court case, and the artist's views and intentions.

Personally, I both loved and hated the idea at first. The more I think about it, the more I find it valuable in some way.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

Especially with the context that Australia didn’t allow women in pubs with men until 1965 so women there were literally sent to “ladies lounges,” which were apparently always some shitty side room, that sometimes would sell them a drink (at higher prices) while they waited.

Turning that on its head as a temporary exhibit at a museum is clearly art to me. It’s not like she did it as a business concept to make money.

[-] potustheplant@feddit.nl 14 points 5 months ago

If it's art, it's pretty childish art. "Revenge" is not useful nor healthy.

[-] june@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago

I don’t see it as revenge, I see it as reflection.

[-] potustheplant@feddit.nl 11 points 5 months ago

Reflection on what? The actions of people that are now senile or dead? And how? By discriminating people? Yeah, really positive.

[-] june@lemmy.world -3 points 5 months ago

Reflection on history. I don’t see that as an inherently negative thing even though it would ostensibly exclude me.

Do projects that drive us to consider the plights of slaves, Jews in the holocaust, or other groups that were tortured, murdered, or otherwise persecuted en masse elicit this same response to you? If not, why?

It seems to me that the art is doing what it’s intended to do, illicit a reaction. What you do with that reaction, positive or negative, is up to you.

[-] potustheplant@feddit.nl 6 points 5 months ago

No one said that reflection on any given topic is negative. Just that this particular way of doing it is antagonistic and I'd argue is even detrimental to the conversation. I mean, if you actually learned that discrimination is wrong, why do you teach that by actually doing it yourself? It's like a parent, that got beat up when he was young, beating up his kid to teach him that violence is a bad thing.

this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
191 points (91.0% liked)

World News

38492 readers
3494 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS