26

The internet used to be where you found the latest information. But it's old enough that you could easily find info on 10-20 year old articles that are out of date and irrelevant

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] doc@kbin.social 22 points 9 months ago

I find it's the opposite: engines are so biased toward new content that older but still useful (or crucial) results are buried. I feel like an archeologist some days, carefully digging through the strata to find ancient hidden treasure.

[-] Scrollone@feddit.it 2 points 9 months ago

You make like Kagi. It's a search engine that lets you - among other things - search old articles. It's a paid service though (but they offer a free 100 queries trial)

[-] De_Narm@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago

Any search engine I've ever used allowed me to filter for results from the past month/year/etc.

[-] entropicdrift 17 points 9 months ago

The real shower thought is that most people don't know how to use advanced search settings anymore when it used to be common knowledge you needed to find anything even slightly niche

[-] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Maybe they searched for “how to limit search results by date”, but the instructions they found were obsolete.

[-] cali_ash@lemmy.wtf 18 points 9 months ago

So set it to only display results from X past years.

[-] Worldtrident@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

I want more than Twitter results though.

[-] Baines@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

this is just a symptom, bigger issue is new data being behind walls

[-] Zippy@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

Worse, many articles do not have the year in the date. What the hell is up with that?

[-] ares35@kbin.social 9 points 9 months ago

and many have a recent date on old, even totally obsolete, articles or posts.

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 2 points 9 months ago

I get entirely too annoyed about both cases.

[-] mtchristo@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago

It is because of google's SEO algorithms. Old content has been around far more to rank up higher. And because people only click on first results. Newer content can't rank against websites with more authority. Sometimes changing the date filter helps.

[-] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

Their seo scores go down though if the page doesn't regularly change whenever the Google bot revisits it though. As it means it is stagnant and no longer being updated.

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

In the past month I've seen mentioned on Lemmy, and downloaded an important article on global climate change, from the late 1800s (Eunice Foote - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eunice_Newton_Foote#%22Circumstances_Affecting_the_Heat_of_the_Sun's_Rays%22), and I'm glad to have come across it. The knife of time cuts in both directions.

[-] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 3 points 9 months ago

I feel like this mainly happens with tech (the kind that's not super new and fancy)

[-] PopMyCop@iusearchlinux.fyi 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Odd. I find it to be the exact opposite. If I want a real article, with thought put into it beside how to make it pop up as #1 in the search engine, I need to set the most recent date possible as prior to 2015 (sometimes even further back).

I suppose it depends on what you're looking for. News articles obviously have to be recent, and it's relatively difficult to bullshit your way into an informative news piece. Advice or DIY instructions though? You better search waaaay far back.

this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
26 points (76.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

29525 readers
1834 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The best ones are thoughts that many people can relate to and they find something funny or interesting in regular stuff.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS