this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2023
40 points (97.6% liked)

Asklemmy

53390 readers
401 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'll go first. I've used a lot of search engines, I used duckduckgo for quite some time but found their search results kinda bad. I'm currently using ecosia the search results are similar to ddg's but at least I'm planting trees, so there's that.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] domesticstreetcat@feddit.ch 3 points 2 years ago

duckduckgo primarily, but have been starting to dabble with a self hosted Whoogle.

[–] Cosmocrat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago
[–] ggt@lemmy.fmhy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Kagi. Yes, it's paid and the pricing structure is really meh, but:

  • Actual privacy
  • No BS like with DDG
  • AI features (like a "quick answer" feature that's really useful)
  • Has its own index along with others
  • Search results are great, probably better than DDG's
  • "Lenses" (basically narrow results by a set of sites)
  • Devs are pretty cool
[–] mrmanager@lemmy.today 0 points 2 years ago

Love Kagi. I switched and never had any reason to use Google again. Its that good.

Kagi. Yes, it’s paid and the pricing structure is really meh, but:

Huh. I hadn't heard of this one before, but I think I'm going to have to try it out.

[–] pumpkin@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I didn't know it was privacy focused or that they were building their own index, that's really cool. Do you think it's worth the money?

[–] zarquon@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago

It's only a few bucks a month. I think so.

The only thing I don't like is needing to be logged in to search. That always feels like a huge invasion of privacy. The at least claim that they don't log search contents though

[–] ggt@lemmy.fmhy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

Bit biased cause I've had it for a while and have a 'legacy plan'. But even without that, absolutely.

[–] howdy@thesimplecorner.org 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

For some reason the thought of a paid search engine has never even crossed by mind before. I've been using DDG but this has peaked my curiosity. Thank you.

Edit: The pricing is... very... meh.

[–] mrmanager@lemmy.today 0 points 2 years ago

It's so worth it.

[–] ggt@lemmy.fmhy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

It is very meh. But I think if you're able to, it's well worth the price. Just don't get the standard plan. That one is god awful.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bit@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

Kagi is absolutely wonderful. Highly recommend giving it ago. Gives me better results than google while having a fair privacy policy

[–] smoke_bird@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 years ago

I've been using Kagi for a few months now and I love it. When I think about how much of my life revolves around accurate information, the price is negligible.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rhythmisaprancer@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Another DuckDuckGo user here. I really like it but wish I could use boolean with it.

[–] mego_pie@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

You can, it just works a bit differently than google if that is what you’re used to. It doesn’t outright exclude results with -, just de-emphasizes it in the results, of course with how tailored many web pages are to gaming search algorithms that doesn’t do much. If you want to outright eliminate certain websites from the search you can do that with -site:siteyouwantgone.here

[–] IuseArchbtw@feddit.de 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Startpage. It uses Googles results, but you will not get tracked that much

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

SearX-NG, coming off DuckDuckGo it wasn't a major change in the internal structure (the search gets relayed over to a larger search engine), but there's no one company behind it like DDG. They've been working together with Microsoft on some rather sketchy things.

I would still love to self-host something decent (that doesn't relay over to a company), but nothing like that exists as far as I know.

[–] CookieJarObserver@feddit.de 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

From what i know the exemption thing was only in the app and has been removed by now and so far the alternatives are... Not very Suitable for everyday use, at least for me.

[–] deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de 0 points 2 years ago

I've heard similar things several times, so I've been staying away. I should move more of my daily tasks to different self-hosted or non-corporate services.

[–] Lyfja@feddit.de 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Duckduckgo, works like I want it to and it's not Google. Never had a problem with its search results either. Tried several others as well including searx and ecosia but I found their image search inferior to ddg's.

[–] mrmanager@lemmy.today 0 points 2 years ago

Kagi is better though. I was using ddg for a long time but had to use Google now and then to get good results.

[–] Steve@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

I hate adds. I was using Neeva. Just switched to Kagi. After nearly 3 weeks, it looks like 300 searches/month will work for me. So $5 a month is fine.

[–] theory@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] mrmanager@lemmy.today 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It's not comparable in quality at all...

[–] theory@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 years ago

It can literally use any search engine you think of as a backend, so its strictly higher quality? Unless thats what you meant

[–] darcmage@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

Isn't that hard to determine without specifying which engines are used in your chosen instance? Searx/Searng has provided superior results for me using a combination of engines compared to anything provided by any of the alternatives by themselves.

[–] t0fr@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago

DDG, it works well enough for me, and not that I got used to bangs I cannot let go of them

[–] Voltage@lemmy.fmhy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

Startpage most of the time but its so slow in showing you the result. When im using the web for studying i just use google without an account because its just WAY faster

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago

Duck Duck Go. It just works for me. I've never had a problem with it's results.

[–] neblem@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

DDG first, Google if that fails and I think the query should have gotten good results, Bing Chat if I'm still really not sure about a topic or if I want some of its summarization (or I'm just feeling lazy).

[–] Slartibartfast@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago

Ecosia on desktop, DuckDuckGo on mobile.

[–] Arimer@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

I use Brave Search. wAs going to switch to Neeva but they are shutting down now.

[–] gibandaley@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

DuckDuckGo, but I've been testing Qwant (also privacy focused) lately as well.

[–] atocci@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

I use Bing just because it was immediately available when I decided I didn't want to use Google anymore.

[–] Rats@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

Duckduckgo for the most part, especially if I already know where I want to get to. Google as a backup like others are saying.

[–] noodlejetski@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

DuckDuckGo. I can't live without !bangs.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Knuschberkeks@feddit.de 0 points 2 years ago

brave search on desktop, DDG on mobile.

[–] agarorn@feddit.de 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Teali0@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

The only problem I've come across with Mullvad is that it's so tight that I can't even access the internet at work on that browser lol

[–] Geometric7792@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

Google, because of inertia and not being given a good reason to switch.

[–] cereals@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Most small search engines use bing results which are a hit or miss compared to Google.

Startpage is the only privacy focused one I found that uses Google search results. The UI is fine for the most part, except the image search maybe.

Edit: typo

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JollyRoberts@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago
[–] CaptainEffort@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago

Just Google, unless I'm looking to pirate something. Then I use Yandex.

[–] Krusty@feddit.it 0 points 2 years ago

I'm using DuckDuckGo but I'm going to switch back to Brave Search when images will be ready

[–] hllywluis@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago

Ever since Bing introduced their AI stuff I've been trialing it + Edge on my main computer. It's not so bad but sometimes I do need to use Google to actually find what I'm looking for. Currently using Google on everything else though. The AI stuff is actually pretty good but I feel like if Google makes their implementation more widespread most people are just going to use that vs Bing.

[–] nate@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

Google most of the time, Yandex if I need to find pictures. Their image search is more like Google's before they nerfed it. I've used Qwant off and on in the past and rather liked it.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί