496
submitted 10 months ago by Ninjazzon@infosec.pub to c/linux@lemmy.ml

Ubuntu's popularity often makes it the default choice for new Linux users. But there are tons of other Linux operating systems that deserve your attention. As such, I've highlighted some Ubuntu alternatives so you can choose based on your needs and requirements—because conformity is boring.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] cbarrick@lemmy.world 90 points 10 months ago

From an engineering perspective, I prefer Debian distros. Apt is the greatest package manager ever built. For a production server, I'd choose Debian or maybe Ubuntu if I needed to pay someone for support.

But for a desktop, Ubuntu kinda sucks. These days, I think I'd recommend Fedora to Linux noobs.

And for my toys at home, I run Arch btw.

[-] Sidewalker@lemm.ee 68 points 10 months ago

Heard. Debian in the streets, Arch in the sheets!

[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 20 points 10 months ago

What about Ubuntu derivatives for desktop? My go to recommendations are Pop! OS and Linux Mint (which I use).

[-] CurbsTickle@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

Linux Mint Debian Edition is my standard recommendation for desktop for those newer folks.

Straight up Debian for everything else. Debian is my desktop. And all of my servers (aside from some things I'm testing for work or something where I need to test against RHEL or something).

And Proxmox for VMs.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works 17 points 10 months ago

Apt is the greatest package manager ever built.

What's your rationale for making that claim?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] sep@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

I was fighting rpm hell on redhat for the 3rd or 4th time using red hat linux 5 to 6 or perhaps 6 to 7. When i first installed debian potato on my daily driver. We had 20 ish servers, but the constant hunt for the right combo of rpm's made me distro jump my own machine. A while later i was floored when i could apt-get full-upgrade to the next debian version without rpm hell and almost everything just worked. Never installed another redhat machine and have been using debian + kde ever since. And 99,3% of all servers i maintain are now debian. A few odd ubuntu machines for $$reasons.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
[-] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 84 points 10 months ago

Imagine putting Manjaro as reliable and cutting edge over, say, Fedora.

[-] kameecoding@lemmy.world 47 points 10 months ago

Imagine putting Manjaro in the article instead of EndeavorOs

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 12 points 10 months ago

Small complaint but the article is decent as a whole

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
[-] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 57 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[-] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 46 points 10 months ago

I don't think that's particularly wrong, tbh.

The key words being targeted at regular desktop users.

Obviously far from being one of the first distros, or distros with a GUI. But targeted at regular desktop users - i.e. "normies"? Absolutely.

People need to remember how crappy and janky the desktop was before Canonical spearheaded a lot of usability improvements.

If only they had continued along that path :/

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] nooneshere@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 10 months ago

Slackware is a garbage distro purely because it doesn't have a functional package manager supporting dependency resolution

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] dog_@lemmy.world 36 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Ubuntu isn't your only option

Thumbnail shows Pop!_OS which is a fork of Ubuntu.

[-] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

For now. They're switching to Debian.
Edit: I think I was thinking of Linux Mint?
Edit again: I was wrong twice, it was Vanilla.
https://linuxiac.com/vanilla-os-announces-major-shift-moving-from-ubuntu-to-debian/

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

New article: Debian isn’t your only option

[-] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 11 points 10 months ago

Yeah but it's the best one

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago

The problem with going for alternatives is support.

Imagine picking a random Linux flavor, then trying to figure out how to change settings, only to get either hundreds of different answers.

[-] FrostyPolicy@suppo.fi 27 points 10 months ago

Depends on the alternative. E.g. Fedora and OpenSuse have very active communities and lots of help available.

[-] sxan@midwest.social 12 points 10 months ago

You're not going to get a telephone number you can call, but the documentation maintained by Arch is far superior to that offered by Ubuntu. If support is your biggest concern, you're far better served by Arch.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] WeAreAllOne@lemm.ee 31 points 10 months ago

No one ever recommends OpenSuse....

[-] ricdeh@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

I am kind of afraid of the corporate influence on OpenSUSE. Same for the relationship between Ubuntu and Canonical

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] ShortN0te@lemmy.ml 26 points 10 months ago

Manjaro: Reliable and Cutting-Edge Features

Rarly laughed that hard. Reliably is by defenition wrong. Manjaro delays packages a few days in their main compared to Arch this can cause issues and makes them not compatible with the AUR which one of the most advertised and enabled by default feature.

You can read more about other problems here, https://github.com/kruug/manjarno

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] aarRJaay@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago

Anyone else notice that the first three are Ubuntu?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 25 points 10 months ago

Ubuntu used to have the mission of being Linux For The Masses. Their marketing material used to include a bunch of trendy diverse young people standing on their logo. I'm pretty sure they've completely abandoned that cause in favor of trying to out-corporate RHEL. Their present-day web page has more corporate logos on it than the starting grid at a NASCAR race, and I challenge you to find the link to download "Normal Ubuntu for normal desktops."

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BaumGeist@lemmy.ml 24 points 10 months ago

Y'all seriously overestimate thr average user:

Debian. It's simple, stable, minimal upkeep, rarely if ever has breaking changes, and all this out of the box.

Someone new doesn't need to be thrown in the deep end for their first foray into linux, they want an experience like windows or mac: simple interface, stable system, some potential for getting their hands dirty but not too much to worry about breaking

[-] TBi@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

Debian? First time i installed it wanted to use CD for packages instead of online. Don’t know why. Second time it didn’t have wireless drivers as these were non free.

It’s a great distro but not for newbies.

Fedora all the way!

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Normal users want that potential for getting their hands dirty to be zero at best

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 10 points 10 months ago

Debian is in many ways the "deep end". A big part of its development philosophy is prioritizing their weirdly rigid definition of Free Software and making it hard to install anything that doesn't fit that. I'm not saying it's not a good distro, but IDK if it's beginner friendly.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 20 points 10 months ago

Well as a psychopath, I always recommend beginners start with Gentoo. Guaranteed they won't go back to Mac or Windows. /s

[-] cbarrick@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

By starting the switch to Gentoo, they either learn Linux well enough to never want to go back, or they fubar their system so bad that they can't go back.

[-] bunjix@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Back in early 2000s I ran Gentoo as daily driver for a year, while almost a Linux noob, but eager to learn. Installation instructions were long, but excellent.

It was fun, and worked well, but in the end the long compilation times got the better of me. Now I heard they are including binary packages, so the itch is coming back.

Right now running opensuse tumbleweed, which works fine, sometimes too smoothly.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NaoPb@eviltoast.org 18 points 10 months ago

I wish howtogeek would change back to their old ms paint logo.

[-] Falcon@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

So Ubuntu, Ubuntu and unstable arch… here let me have a go:

  1. Fedora
  2. Tumbleweed
  3. Endeavour OS
  • easy install arch with extra repos, zfs and and dracut
  1. Bonus for the curious
  • void
  • Redcore Gentoo
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TronNerd82@lemmy.ml 16 points 10 months ago

My personal recommendations for beginner distros:

-OpenSUSE

-Fedora

-EndeavourOS

-KDE Neon

-ElementaryOS

-Zorin OS

-Linux Mint

Or you could just install ordinary Debian, since it's stable and well-supported. Kind of a GOAT among distros, alongside Slackware.

[-] witx 12 points 10 months ago

imho Debian is far from beginner friendly. They will end up with a laptop without WiFi.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BmeBenji@lemm.ee 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

“New to Linux? Where the most daunting thing about switching to it is how many choices you have in configuration? Well, good news! You have more choices than you think!”

[-] devilish666@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

Well many search engine results recommended ubuntu for newbie.
I remembered the first time i used linux (15 years ago), i choose ubuntu because google recommended it & it has very nice UI compared to other linux that time

[-] erwan@lemmy.ml 15 points 10 months ago

Ubuntu was the first distribution trying to release a consistent OS, rather than throwing every Linux software possible and letting the user choose.

Also they provided graphical tools for everything, in a user friendly way and consistent with the rest of the Desktop.

But nowadays most mainstream distributions propose that anyway.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Ganbat@lemmyonline.com 13 points 10 months ago

Recommending Pop_OS! to newbies

That might just be the quickest way to make someone hate Linux forever. The glitchiest, most troublesome install I've ever tried to do. In the end, after two days of work just to get the damn live image to boot, the only reason I kept going was probably sunken cost falacy.

[-] sekhat@lemmy.temporus.me 13 points 10 months ago

Funny. The one time I installed it, I just stuck it on a usb, booted from it, started the installer, next, next, done.

I really didn't have much of a different experience between installing pop os Vs Ubuntu.

I guess some weird hardware thing that Pop OS doesn't provide for?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] M500@lemmy.ml 11 points 10 months ago

To any Linux curious users,

I consider myself to be an intermediate Linux user. I have hosted applications and services on Linux servers in the cloud and use it as my primary operating system. I recommend Linux Mint. If you have an nvidia GPU, then I recommend PopOS as they have a version that has nvidia drivers pre-installed.

When I first started with Linux, I thought that Mint was less capable than other distros as it was the most user friendly. But I learned that you can do anything you want with any Linux distro. It is just that Mint is the least likely to give you trouble with random things.

With that all being said, you will have far fewer issues with Linux than you will with Windows.

Additionally, you can get legit troubleshooting steps for linux that actually work. With Windows it seems that there are 100 ways to possibly fix an issue and they feel like patching a sinking boat.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] jaschen@lemm.ee 10 points 10 months ago

Not the first time trying Linux, but the first time in the last 10 years since I tried it and I'm digging Mint. Still has problems with my Logitech steering wheel and Logitech mouse, but overall not bad.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
496 points (94.9% liked)

Linux

48714 readers
1338 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS