this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2024
56 points (83.3% liked)

World News

36988 readers
704 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 43 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I love how mad this is making people.

He's the Pope. Obviously he's going to want peace. What the hell do people expect? He doesn't care if land is Russian or Ukrainian as long as people stop dying. The geopolitics of the situation are simply not part of his ideology.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Interesting that he chooses to say the people having a genocide done on them need to surrender (which they've literally done and been shot anyway btw) and not the perpetrators of said genocide needing to stop.

Probably because the Pope is and always has been a piece of shit

[–] Nobilmantis@feddit.it 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Interesting that he chooses to say the people having a genocide done on them need to surrender

Huh he didnt say this about the people in Gaza, what are you talking about?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

War crimes like the forcible transfer of children (i.e. genocide) are for the ICJ to deal with. As a religious leader his prerogative is to reduce suffering and death, by whatever means necessary.

More importantly, Russia can keep this up far longer than Ukraine and he doesn't want us to fight to the last Ukrainian.

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I remember when they said they said they were going to charge Russia with war crimes and then when they investigated they found Russia wasn't doing any war crimes, but in the process discovered they themselves were actually doing quite a few of their own. Every right wing accusation is a confession.

[–] Aidinthel@reddthat.com -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Right, a smaller country can never successfully resist a larger one. That's why Vietnam has been under US occupation (or was it French? I can never remember for some reason) all these years since Ho Cho Minh wisely surrendered to spare his people's lives.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 year ago

A smaller neighbor is vastly different. Vietnam was on the other side of the planet for America and halfway for France. You can't ignore that.

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The Viet Minh had the support of the people. The Kyiv regime needs to send out kidnapping squads to fill gaps in their lines. They do not have the support of the people, so their prospects for a successful insurgency are nil.

[–] GinAndJuche@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

Pokemon Blue/Yellow

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pelikan@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Well, if Pope is called "piece of shit" for calling to negotiations to prevent more people dying, then who are you, who's ok with war going on? Entire shit?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

The moral compass of your average liberal is so fucked up the idea that people should die in large quantities for property is normal to them.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This only makes sense under the assumption that if the land becomes Russian, the dying will stop. And that's not guaranteed. Dropping down from dying to violence - that's probably guaranteed to occur for a while if the land becomes Russian.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (16 children)

Why wouldn't the dying stop? Russia is going to need as many workers as possible to rebuild and make up for military losses, on top of the preexisting population stagnation that was already dwindling their workforce. The worst case scenario imo is population transfer, and that's not good, but I don't see Russia being able or willing to waste a population boost from Ukraine.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah shit the goddamned Pope is a Russian troll

[–] CableMonster@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or maybe people that think Ukraine should negotiate are actually just normal people that can analyze facts...

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

It's all good, they were kidding

[–] Trudge@lemmygrad.ml 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

We're not paying Dalai Lama to stay quiet. Have him say "to the last Ukrainian" immediately!

[–] juchebot88@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 1 year ago

I mean, it wouldn't be the first time feudal Tibet ended up featuring in Nazi propaganda.

[–] gomp@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

Yeah, he's old and didn't use the happiest words.. but the Vatican clarified he didn't mean "unconditional surrender" and instead only meant "negotiate a peace deal".

AFAIU (and also AFAIC - "as far as I care") It's not entirely clear yet if the Pope suggests that Ukraine should give up territory in exchange for peace (and what about reparations?) or if he just means "be good people and make peace" (which would be much more in line with how he usually talks). I don't think whatever the Pope thinks will really be of much consequence given how geopolitically relevant this war is ("The Pope? How many divisions has he got?")

This whole news/argument serves as great marketing for the TV program where the the interview will be broadcasted (which I'd assume is not unintentional)

load more comments
view more: next ›