61
submitted 5 months ago by zerodawn@leaf.dance to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

For a time it was Fennic for addon support but now that Firefox mobile has addons are there better alternatives? Those of you on android, what's your go to?

all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] silent_squirrel@feddit.de 37 points 5 months ago

Mull (from the DivestOS developers)

But nowadays I'm using a Chromium based browser on my phone because Firefox on Android doesn't support process isolation

[-] dataprolet@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 5 months ago

+1 for Mull.

And yeah, on Android unfortunately you gotta choose between privacy (Firefox/Mull) or security (Chromium).

[-] degen@midwest.social 8 points 5 months ago

Another for Mull and Cromite, here. I don't really use Mull unless I'm looking for absolute compatibility with things like web games.

[-] GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 months ago

Mull is reasonably secure for most of the people. Only very high targets need that kind of security

[-] PirateMike94@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Why not both, with Brave? I know their are kinda hated for making changes without warning the user, but it seems to be the closest thing to a fairly private and secure browser... Plus they have a whole team behind it, not just some guy in his basement (nothing against guys in their basements btw, it's just harder to be on top of security issues when you're one).

[-] GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago

It would be great to hear the implication of that

[-] silent_squirrel@feddit.de 2 points 5 months ago

Here you can find a good explanation on that.

[-] GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

It would still need an Android system/kernel exploit to further escape the system sandbox. It is an important hardening feature, but the browser isn't completely insecure without it

So what? You can go back to firefox for that reasoning unless you are a very very high target

[-] silent_squirrel@feddit.de 3 points 5 months ago

Did you read the sentence before that? A malicious website could read data from other websites(opened in different tabs), and also passwords stored in the browser, etc... There is no additional system exploit needed for that

[-] GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml -1 points 5 months ago

Yes. It doesn't apply to me. I am no very high target.

[-] Atemu@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago

What @silent_squirrel@feddit.de mentioned does not require a targetted attack.

[-] Delusion6903@discuss.online 1 points 5 months ago

Yeah, they need to fix that

[-] rizoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 5 months ago

I use Firefox cause it's easier to get people to switch to something that's already in every app store.

[-] kugmo@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 months ago

Based convenience enjoyer

[-] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 5 months ago

IMO, standard Firefox is pretty OK, so I'd rather use that than some weird derivative that has more chances of security issues, breakage, or development halt.

[-] kevincox@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago

Yup. So many of these "alternative" browsers have very questionable security practices. At the very minimum they don't have a staffed team to respond to zero-day exploits. But often they also make large changes without too much consideration for security or disable security features when they get in the way of features. I hate saying "use on of the big boys" but for most users their browser is likely their largest attack surface by an order of magnitude, it's job is literally to download an execute untrusted code and the API surface is huge. It takes real resources and careful development to develop and maintain a browser, and there are very few organizations that I would trust to do this.

So unless you have a strong reason I would highly recommend sticking to one of the major browsers.

[-] KpntAutismus@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

same, haven't strayed from standard firefox since it does what i want just fine.

[-] WheelcharArtist@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Firefox with noscript and ublock addons since years

[-] Pantherina@feddit.de 6 points 5 months ago

Mull, but use the DivestOS repository. F-droid also builds it but too much delayed.

[-] Delusion6903@discuss.online 4 points 5 months ago

Mull would be perfect except for the annoyingly slow refresh rate enabled by the fingerprint resistance. It needs to just report a low refresh rate while actually using a higher one.

[-] herrfrutti@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

You can take a look at FFUpdater on F-Droid. There you can see different browsers for android and information about the features they have.

I'm useing mull.

[-] Delusion6903@discuss.online 1 points 5 months ago

I'll use mull again when I can scroll without the screen looking like a strobe light

[-] hashferret@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Stupid as it is my biggest complaint is that none of them seem to have amoled dark mode. Been using and enjoying fennec but I really want my perfect blacks back.

[-] lorkano@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

People kinda stopped implementing full black once they realized that battery savings between dark gray and black is negligible

[-] toastal@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago

It’s still a measurable difference & it looks nicer having the pixels fully off. No need to dismiss the parent’s preference. Personally, I find the dark gray arguments pretty weak.

[-] lorkano@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

It is measurable difference, but it's only 0.3% more of battery life compared to dark gray. This is very good article about this: https://www.xda-developers.com/amoled-black-vs-gray-dark-mode/

[-] toastal@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I’ve read that article several times before (and have written about the topic), but on a global screen usage scale 0.3% is still not 0% so you could argue that if saving power is the goal of using a dark theme on OLED devices, then maximum black would be a most ethical design choice. I will take my 0.3% battery + an aesthetic I like better any day.

[-] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago

I haven't used my tablet in months, but I will always recommend Mull.

[-] guyrocket@kbin.social 2 points 5 months ago
[-] rolling_resistance@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Vanadium is not based on Firefox. Not to mention that it doesn't let you use add-ons, and OP clearly wants them.

[-] jjlinux@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago

Vanadium and Mull.

[-] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.one 2 points 5 months ago

Maybe try waterfox? It just arrived on Android. I don’t know if there is an f-droid version.

[-] Deckweiss@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

iceraven

it has a lot of the regular firefox plugins available for installation from the menu. And also some privacy enhancements.

this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2024
61 points (94.2% liked)

Privacy

30690 readers
1628 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS