61

What emerged in two interviews with Trump, and conversations with more than a dozen of his closest advisers and confidants, were the outlines of an imperial presidency that would reshape America and its role in the world.”

“To carry out a deportation operation designed to remove more than 11 million people from the country, Trump told me, he would be willing to build migrant detention camps and deploy the U.S. military, both at the border and inland. He would let red states monitor women’s pregnancies and prosecute those who violate abortion bans. He would, at his personal discretion, withhold funds appropriated by Congress, according to top advisers. He would be willing to fire a U.S. Attorney who doesn’t carry out his order to prosecute someone, breaking with a tradition of independent law enforcement that dates from America’s founding.”

“He is weighing pardons for every one of his supporters accused of attacking the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, more than 800 of whom have pleaded guilty or been convicted by a jury. He might not come to the aid of an attacked ally in Europe or Asia if he felt that country wasn’t paying enough for its own defense. He would gut the U.S. civil service, deploy the National Guard to American cities as he sees fit, close the White House pandemic-preparedness office, and staff his Administration with acolytes who back his false assertion that the 2020 election was stolen.”

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 34 points 3 months ago

Back in 2016, after the election, the NY Times put together a panel discussion with the creators of all the top TV political shows. Veep, The West Wing, Scandal, and others. Every producer and writer questioned said the same thing; if they'd had a fictional character say that the "liked soldiers who didn't get captured" on a show the netowrks and advertisers would demand that the character be hated and despised by every American.

[-] dugmeup@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

Please no one tell this buffoon about the NKVD. He would drool for that kind of power.

What a travesty of a leader the GOP have chosen.

They want the USA to be the USSR in practice.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Plus a liberal dose of Nazi Germany.

[-] NeptuneOrbit@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

But hey, we'd keep our guns!

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

And instead of three mass shootings a week, you'll have three a day. Yay!

[-] Mastengwe@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It’s too bad the “bOtH siDeS” kids have their heads shoved so far up some long-dead antisemitic socialist’s ass to bother reading this.

[-] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

The existence of a presidential pardon blows my mind. It assumes that some miscarriage of justice has occurred and the president is able to detect it in a way that the legion of criminal justice administrators could not. America has devolved into crony capitalism.

this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2024
61 points (87.7% liked)

politics

18601 readers
4327 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS