25
Lol as an American, good luck with that. You'll probably have some "good times" in early to mid-stage capitalism. Then, you'll reach late stage and realize it's all rigged.
Nah. The tracks are laid already. They'll go straight to late stage. Turns out the problem was never free market versus heavily regulated. It was always rich people twisting the system.
Yeah, it's not like there's been a good track record in Latin America of socialism being allowed to be implemented. There's basically 2 countries you could call socialist, and both are sanctioned and under constant threat of regime change.
That sounds like how Latin America already works...
Well yeah, and that's the false promise being sold to these people. At least with the economy and national resources under government care there's a hope to clear out corruption and a certain amount of welfare had to exist to get votes. Once it all goes private it's going to be ten times worse because there's no such check on a corporation. They'll just sell your potatoes right out from under you and bring in foreign troops to enforce it.
This isn't really a major shift for Panama, it was already a fairly right-wing country. People voted for Mulino because life was good and the economy was strong under Martinelli and they want those days back, not because they particularly like his policies.
That title is a stretch on so many sides. But it's DW after all so it's unsurprising
You could, maybe, try to make the argument that the use of the term "pro-business" is not meant in a laudatory sense. However, I find even this to be a stretch and, especially, if the article is written for an international audience.
They could have well framed the article around the the multiple controversies surrounding these characters. Heck, Mulino (who is standing in for Panama's criminally condemned former President), is said to visit Cuba with certain frequency or, at the very least, uses a private jet that does.
Election results always seem to mean exactly what the person writing about them has been telling everyone for years. Funny that.
Latin America is big, populated and diverse. Argentina, Ecuador, Panamá, Salvador are still outliers
Edit: most of those countries were in deep institutional crisis for years (Idk about panama). I doubt this is a new wave.
Somebody has to tell them, there's no such thing as free markets. All big players will just set up shell companies and own your country too.
Announcer voice: “It won’t help.”
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Following the recent election victories of pro-business candidates in Argentina and Ecuador, voters in Panama also chose a staunch free-market advocate as their next president in a poll held earlier this month.
In November last year, far-right libertarian Javier Milei won the presidency in Argentina, vowing to "exterminate" rampant inflation and "put a chainsaw to the state."
The Harvard Kennedy School graduate focused his campaign on job creation, recommending tax exemptions and incentives for new businesses and pledging to attract more foreign investment.
Winfried Weck from the German Konrad-Adenauer Foundation in Panama City says Mulino has adopted the economic strategy that was considered successful during the 2009-2014 Martinelli presidency.
Despite Argentina's nascent recovery, Christian Hauser, a Latin America expert at the University of Applied Sciences Graubünden, Switzerland, warns against excessive expectations.
For now, though, Latin America's three new pro-market presidents will have to wait until after next month's elections for the EU Parliament to see if Europeans will seize the opportunity to create more growth on both sides of the Atlantic.
The original article contains 687 words, the summary contains 166 words. Saved 76%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Hhhhhhhhhh...
this post was submitted on 23 May 2024
25 points (66.2% liked)
World News
38977 readers
2898 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS