Genuinely came to that conclusion a while back as well. That and the fact that going heavily into politics is probably for most people the best chance to enact the most change. Which is a weird thought.

[–] Whey_Isolate@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Blowing up fossil fuel infrastructure would only create more environmental damage. Instead the best course of action is to murder the executives and politicians that allow/subsidize them

[–] sombrero@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

this comment went from sensible to taliban real quick.

[–] gkrnours@mastodon.gamedev.place 1 points 2 years ago

@Whey_Isolate @bezmuth That's right. Even without subsidize, we would use fossil fuel. Not most people and their car. But one tractor can do the job of like 500 people in a field. Then we get a few tons of cereal.

[–] Lux@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Literally me

[–] Hitraptor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Half of its made easier for you by its use of flammable material :3

[–] sergio@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago

And the atmosphere is full of oxygen, we're already 2/3 the way there

[–] SteveXVII@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 years ago

I can't help but think that those who block private jets shut go further and destroy a few of them.