163
submitted 3 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 64 points 3 months ago

The “kill gays” shit in Uganda comes from the influence of Evangelicals in the US.

[-] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

Didn’t some evangelical fly there to get some photo ops around the passage of that bill? Truly disgusting, but shows you what they really think.

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

More than that. They poured money and propaganda into Uganda to convince them that their problems are all because of gay people.

American evangelical groups have since spent years and tens of millions of dollars spreading homophobia in Uganda and beyond. Data from OpenDemocracy shows that from 2007 to 2020, over 20 US evangelical groups spent at least $54 million in Africa “to influence laws, policies, and public opinion against sexual and reproductive rights." Nearly half of that figure was spent in Uganda.

This movement quickly gained traction in 2009 after top American evangelical leaders headlined a three-day conference in Kampala on “exposing the homosexuals’ agenda.” Speakers promoted the notion that the “traditional” Ugandan family is exclusively heterosexual, claiming that gay Westerners and activists are attempting to spread homosexuality by corrupting and recruiting children around the world.

[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Oddly if you ask Ugandans they claim its their idea to keep out foreign ideas.

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago
[-] refurbishedrefurbisher 5 points 3 months ago

They can't do that since it might actually accomplish something.

[-] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 7 points 3 months ago

Not to detract from said law, but you'd think our reps would have more important issues to deal with domestically

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

Por que no los dos?

I hate that argument because it's not like there's any limit to how many bills they can introduce.

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

No. There aren't any other issues they can deal with. The Democratic representatives can write any number of bills that, if passed, would help people, industry, climate , or anything else. The problem is, anything the Democrats propose would be reflexively shat on by the Republican majority and never pass. The Democrats could probably write an American version of the Kill the Gays bill and the House Republicans would still vote it down just to keep Biden from having a win.

The only positive thing the Democratic majority can do is force the Republicans to show their true colors by making them vote to support this hideous Ugandan law.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It's just a sense of the House, not a law. House keeping is part of the job, unfortunately the only one they can get done these days.

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago

I can't WAIT for the Log Cabin Republicans to APPLAUD the BLOCKAGE of this Bill!

[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Good it is a disgusting law.

[-] StaySquared@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago

Welp guess we're going to start a proxy war with Uganda to bomb them with freedom and democracies.

this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
163 points (98.2% liked)

politics

18973 readers
3033 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS