It's the internet, it might not even be Canadians.

Yup. They need to hold Pierre Poilievre and his cronies accountable by supporting proportional representation.

Even USA free speech doesn't protect you from assaulting people verbally with hate. Freespeech ends at the other persons consiltitutional rights of thing like freedom to travel unmolested by others.

Same as the USA, it's just been hijacked by racists, homophobes, and christo-fascists (dare I repeat myself).

IMHO the issue is that the the CPC is a "big tent" that was historically dominated by SoCons (which Harper kept in line pretty well), however over the past approx. 5-8 years the Libertarian contingent has grown quite a bit from grassroots.

Now even many of these "Libertarians" generally abide by SoCon principles but they don't feel any need to push them on the general population; these people simply want to be left alone. This is causing some friction in the party as some SoCons are appealing to the "No True Scotsman" fallacy when discussing internal party/supporter politics.

So because she is expected to support free speech there are opinions she’s not permitted to express? Incredible.

Yes. That's the point of conservatism. Free speech for the in-group, oppression for the out-group.

You have to remember Wilhoit's Law: Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

She's my MP.

Yes, this is a good thing she did. She's not a good MP, she's made a lot of silly mistakes, and she's still a kinda-vapid vlogger-turned-politician who's known around town for grifting for handouts, but she did one good thing here.

And because the political right has been trained on fascist red-meat, she's getting vilified for it, and we'll probably get some Nazi hick from Peterborough County next time.