47
submitted 3 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] toast@retrolemmy.com 54 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Trump has been overcharging the secret service for years. Why wouldn't efforts to limit his grifting be in place?

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Perhaps they just hit the limit of their budget

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 48 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Dude fuck him

He tried to kill America. If he gets back in office he plans to put the axe to any secret service personnel who don’t get on board with the murder. Just tell him no, go fuck yourself, insurrectionists don’t get protection and favors provided by the systems they’re insurrectioning. Figure out your own fucking security and count your blessings that we’re leaving you alone to do that much until the courts get their act together hopefully.

Hijacking the systems that are intended to be used by people who aren’t enemies to the country, and everyone going along with it like everything’s normal, is a key way that fascists slip into the systems which they then use to do terrible things.

There is a time and a place for democratic norms. He should have a trial, he should have lawyers, he shouldn’t just get assassinated and the country explode into civil war. But don’t give him fucking secret service protection. Now, or if he wins, or after he’s inaugurated.

He is the enemy to the system.

The system better wake the fuck up and start treating him that way. All this inviting the wolf in the house and showing him where he can sleep in the fucking guest room and where the coffee is is how we got Hitler.

[-] charade_you_are@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 months ago

pretty good policy if it only applies to him imo

[-] Fondots@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

In general, I'd like to see secret service protection for ex presidents limited to only to basic everyday security. Their homes, offices, daily commuting, errands, family events, etc. the kind of stuff that any regular private citizen has to do.

Anything above and beyond that they should have to arrange their own security services. No one is making private citizen trump hold rallies and invite throngs of people to gather around him while he stands up on a stage, most of us don't do that, and if we do we're certainly on the hook for security if we need it.

Now being a presidential candidate, he's also entitled to usss protection within 120 days of the general election, which I suppose I can agree with, and that would have kicked in for him on 7/8, so a few days before the assassination attempt, so I guess this might still be their mess to deal with if we think they should have to provide security for campaign events.

[-] 800XL@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Awww, gee whilikers that's too bad. Anyways,

this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
47 points (87.3% liked)

News

23232 readers
3435 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS