103

Why Democrats are Feasting on J.D. Vance’s Back Catalogue of Bloopers (www.thedailybeast.com)

submitted 4 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] bcgm3@lemmy.world 47 points 4 months ago

Because he's like a very fragile elementary school bully; it's as satisfying to point out all the ways that he sucks as it is easy.

[-] Minarble@aussie.zone 12 points 4 months ago

It’s because Jacque de Dolphin Vance is nearly as weird as his very weird and very old boss.Sad!

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -3 points 4 months ago

Daily Beast Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [Medium] (Click to view Full Report)

Daily Beast is rated with Medium Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.

Bias: Left
Factual Reporting: Mixed
Country: United States of America
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-beast/

Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News

Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.

Footer

Media Bias Fact Check is a fact-checking website that rates the bias and credibility of news sources. They are known for their comprehensive and detailed reports.

Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.

[-] nnullzz@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

Although I really appreciate this bot since bias is something I try to search for when I read articles, maybe the bot can take up less lines of text. At least for me on mobile, it’s kinda taking up a decent block off a lot of comment sections. Just a suggestion as a fan of this bot.

[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Agree, my lemmy client also expands links out, so this comment takes over two full screen heights of my relatively large screened phone.

For this bot to not be annoying it needs much less content in the messages, maybe just a line about the rating and a single external link for more info

this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024

103 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19233 readers

2292 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News