I was fully on the side of Biden staying in the race and I have never been a Kamala fan, but I was wrong. This is exactly what we need right now. This might be the end of civilized society as we know it, but at least the new 97 days are going to be fun as hell. We have a candidate who is ready to scrap and has the goods to back it up.
dishing out some sweet... Harrisment
“As president I will bring back the border security bill that Donald Trump killed, and I will sign it into law and show Donald Trump what real leadership looks like,” she added.
She assassinates better than that false flag ear boy.
That's a BAD idea, though. That's a BAD bill that they literally designed to be Trumpian in a (successful) effort to prove that the GOP wouldn't even accept what they asked for if it gives a win to Democrats.
Show him and the rest of the American Fascist Party up by bringing a BETTER bill.
One that actually fixes some of the REAL problems at the border such as the threadbare immigration courts and all the laws making legal immigration so onerous that illegal immigration is inevitable.
Its a bad bill that is good to campaign on. Fox and the ilk have ramped the border up to be a huge issue when it isn't. Its almost the only weapon the GOP has, so hammering on the fact that dems had agreed to the most GOP loved, restrictive border bill in 25 years and Trump publicly and loudly killed it is a fantastic tool to use.
Its a bad bill that is good to campaign on
Not really, no. The vast majority of undecided voters aren't right wing people trying to decide between the parties, but left wing people trying to decide if voting is worth the bother. It of course is, but not everyone is convinced.
hammering on the fact that dems had agreed to the most GOP loved, restrictive border bill in 25 years and Trump publicly and loudly killed it is a fantastic tool to use.
Not really, no. The left doesn't want GOP loved border bills and the left is who she'll have to convince to turn out.
Reminding people who hate xenophobia that the Dems are writing xenophobic and counterproductive border bills is shooting herself in the foot.
You have to be blind or stupid to think the Democratic party is against border tightening, all of the highest numbers of deportation in the last 30 years have been with Dems in office.
I'm talking about left wing voters being against xenophobic and counterproductive immigration law.
Not the center right to right wing Democratic Party that's has maybe a dozen left wing candidates in all of Washington and is primarying almost all of them.
I know that THOSE fuckers love themselves some "tightening" 🙄
There aren't that many left wing voters in the us, there would be if the vote existed in earnest but we all know if a socialist wins a socialist signs their death warrant the same day.
There aren't that many left wing voters in the us
There would be if the so-called left of center (actually center right to right wing) party would stop alienating the left into becoming nonvoters.
there would be if the vote existed
Wtf does that even mean?
we all know if a socialist wins a socialist signs their death warrant the same day.
First of all, nobody knows that. Because it's bullshit.
Second, the left is SO much more than just socialists. Your reductionism isn't cleverness and it isn't helpful.
There would be yes, currently there aren't.
You just said it, people don't vote left because it's a throw away via, they view Dem against their best interest.
Yes yes, as we all know America loves a socialist, none have been g family jailed or murdered for being vocal socialists.....
Sure, but the two most main stream sects of the farthest left being socialism and communism so not exist in American politics.
Seriously. Who is asking the dems to become more right wing?
Their owner donors, probably. That plus their perpetual strategy of always chasing the new "middle" every time the GOP moves further right, regardless of the fact that "just left of a literal fascist party" is FAR right 🤦
Huh? Underestimating centrists. Topics like this are for them, not leftists
Stoop kid's afraid to leave his stoop!
Stoop kid's afraid to leave his stoop!
Stoop kid's afraid to leave his stoop!
What? I'm guessing this is a reference....
Yeah, Stoop Kid is a minor character from the late 90s, early 00s Nickelodeon show, Hey Arnold.
Ah yeah. I was just a touch too old for it by the time that came out.
I've been thinking this about this kid at the motel I'm at right now. Just sits on the outside stairs on his phone. Maybe for wifi or space, not my business. I just haven't seen him anywhere else
More on topic. The orange shit bag is super afraid, and it is fucking delicious. I was still going to vote, but I didn't expect to win. Now I actually think we have more than just a decent shot
maybe that kid is better off outside in the steps than dealing with whatever/whomever is in his motel room. maybe daddy is drunk and tirading on the phone and about to get violent again.. or maybe mommy has another rando friend over she's flirting with trying to score. 'stay where i can see you!' but out of the danger zone.
You have put way more thought into this than I have. It was a teenager, so probably just wanted to be left alone
I feel like this is the kind of attitude many folks were hoping would come from Biden, and I feel like it will be so much better (worse for Trump?) coming from anyone who is not a white man.
He wont answer that. He cant.
He was a city kid who bullied everyone that walked by his house. Everyone was afraid of him til some kids realized he was actually agoraphobic, and was too scared to chase people/leave his stoop.
The bully became the bullied.
Stoop Kid is redeemed though.
Oh snap!
Iconic
The Hill Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)
The Hill is rated with High Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.
Bias: Least Biased
Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual
Country: United States of America
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-hill/
Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News
Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.
Footer
Media Bias Fact Check is a fact-checking website that rates the bias and credibility of news sources. They are known for their comprehensive and detailed reports.
Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News