177
Universal Healthcare was a losing platform because it was vilified as being “communism”. It also didn’t sit well with wealthy donors and rich democrats. It also wasn’t part of Biden’s agenda. Obamacare was.
Balogna
They mailed it to Israel.
Every time Democrats bring big ideas, gun control, healthcare, the rabbid Republicans come out in the midterms and vote the Democrats out.
Meanwhile the youth never gets energized enough because they think winning one election is all it should take and if you don't have universal healthcare by March you're a sellout and they'll stop voting.
Real change means voting in EVERY election, starting locally and going up, for decades.
That's what the Republicans have done and they've captchured a bunch of governments and institutions.
heard this my entire life as did my father who was told by his dad
no progress is not won over night, but it has been several lifetimes worth of over nights and the time to shit or get off the pot is now
It seems like there is no need to mention it because the opposition is doing a good job at highlighting it as a democratic point.
Outside of the US. Always has been.
Because they were never going to do that shit in the first place. All propaganda and pandering points.
Saving the democracy is at the front and center. January 6th treason, countless lawsuits for election denial/tampering, Trump found selling national secrets from his bathroom, found guilty for raping, convicted on 34 counts of felony, project 2025 promising end of democracy, and yet Trump getting nominated by GOP - all of this happens in last 3.5 years. Republicans have openly embraced dictatorship since last presidential election.
Actually following up on major efforts like universal healthcare would go a long way to ensuring the Democrats continue to win at the ballot box., since their odds of winning are based entirely on turnout and people are sick of campaign promises being ignored.
this is bullshit. they could easily do both
Boring~
I'm already not voting for the Republicans, but I'd love to have an actual reason to get excited about voting for Democrats.
Learn how a bill becomes law and you will realize why and how important it is to get as many Dems elected as possible.
Last time Dems had trifecta (2021-22) they had 50-50 senate - with 2 asshole republicans disguised as Dems (Sinema and Manchin) who blocked every progressive bills such as election integrity laws, immigration, reproductive rights. Of course that doesn’t absolve actual repubes. In fact not even 10 out of 50 republican senators had balls to stand up for what’s right.
If the Democrats want to get as many votes as possible they should give people more reasons to do so. Now is the best time to introduce a universal healthcare plan, even if it can't pass it provides a PR field day when Republicans reject it.
Sinema and Manchin were doing exactly what party leadership wanted.
They only bring those policies out when they're not in power
Ask Hillary
Hillary got the healthcare law she ran on. No public option and an individual mandate.
You mean “Madam President” Hillary?
That is what was being discussed. Why isn’t Kamala bearing down on healthcare as a campaign issue.
As someone who has spent decades on both Europe and the US, I can firmly say that the US healthcare system is my least favorite thing about the US.
this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2024
177 points (91.9% liked)
politics
19233 readers
2182 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS