-67

Kamala Harris' lead in blue state halved by Donald Trump: poll (www.newsweek.com)

submitted 2 weeks ago by realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.club to c/politics@lemmy.world

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world 49 points 2 weeks ago

TL;DR: A poll in Minnesota of 635 likely voters showed her lead after the DNC went from 10 to 5 percent. And it also has a margin of error of +-4.5 percent. So in other words, this is a tiny ass poll with a margin of error almost the exact same size as the supposed lead being halved. I'm not saying it's not possible, but with such a small poll, I don't know how accurate this.

[-] aalvare2@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

If I understand margin of error correctly, then what this means is that the “true” lead that harris had over trump at the time of this poll has a 95% chance of being somewhere between +(5+4.5) and +(5-4.5).

So according to just this poll, there’s a 95% that Harris’ lead in Minnesota is between 9.5% and 0.5%, so somewhere between “what the polling was nearly already saying” and “almost neck and neck”.

And that’s not even taking any of the other polling into consideration…

TL;DR yeah, this poll isn’t very useful.

[-] ABCDE@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

635 is not that small. Regular polling should show us a good idea of how play stands.

[-] LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Considering there are polls that have 2000 or more people and those are generally considered more reliable, 635 is pretty small. It might not be small in a gym, but it's smaller than my graduating high school class. So it's less reliable as such.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

I guess we just have to admit that Trump has led a way better campaign this past month.
/s

[-] CaliforniaSober@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 weeks ago

Clearly the polls show that pissing on Arlington is a winning strategy…

Trump should keep insulting veterans… considering the polls.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Minnesota has been on the edge since Biden was in the race, I kept pointing this out to cries of "nuh unh" but the numbers there are VERY squishy.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/minnesota/

Biden by 2, Trump by 3, ties... it's been ugly there.

[-] medgremlin@midwest.social 0 points 2 weeks ago

What in the hell are you talking about? Kamala's lead is variable, but substantial.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Shrinking, which means Trump has the momentum.

She got a bump when she tapped in for Biden, but that bump is now fading.

[-] Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world -4 points 2 weeks ago

The media keeps telling me everyone has excitement and vibes for Harris, but everyone in the street I talk to about her seems even more disgusted than when Biden was running. She’s done one interview where she was on her back foot but media is saying she was stunning and brave. Her whole support feels like the brain dead blue no matter who crowd and its turning into a giant turnoff for everyone who isn’t. I thought ditching Biden would stop it, but Dems seem to really want Trump to win all states as Harris is being compared to Hilary (Shoved down our throat politician whose qualifications seem to amount to being a Dem loyalist, not an actual winning candidate)

this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2024

-67 points (11.5% liked)

politics

18852 readers

5153 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News