102

Harris campaign lists policies on eve of debate after criticism of vagueness (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 1 month ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 40 points 1 month ago

Give him zero prep time.

Lol. He doesn't prep. He's been so opposed to prep, they are having what they are calling "Policy Time" where others question and answer each other in front of him. He's prepping via osmosis.

[-] frunch@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

He don't need no prep!

My man got the weave lol

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I want a source, not because I doubt you but because I desperately need something to distract me from the stress of this political cycle and that sounds fucking hilarious to read about.

[-] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

This is the closest I could find, but still seems a little sane-washed.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-to-watch-in-the-abc-harris-trump-debate

But most of the latenight and podcast people were talking about it today/tonight. I'm sure there's a better article. But I can't find a good one since the search terms include Donald Trump and debate and time, so it's just so desperately trying to inform me what time the debate is.

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

FINALLY! Here's the Harris/Walz policy: https://kamalaharris.com/issues/

[-] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Looks like a really compelling list of policy stances, thanks for posting

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Of course I would have liked to see more but at least it's something.

[-] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'm curious what you'd have liked that wasn't included? We got cost of living issues, social issues like protections for queer folks, health of our democratic institutions kinda stuff, the climate crisis; I feel like she mentioned pretty much all the stuff I really care about

(Making conversation, not challenging your perspective :)

[-] FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

My guess is people want more assurance that she will actually put her foot down with Israel. The policy mentions it but mostly just says "we'll keep working hard on this like we have been".

Obviously still miles better than what Trump offers there, but I believe that's the biggest grievance the left will have with Kamala's stated policies.

[-] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Ahhh, yeah that's fair, I was thinking domestically

Take care :)

[-] ABCDE@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Finally. This is when the actual election should start.

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago

The Guardian - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

Information for The Guardian:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.News

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/sep/09/kamala-harris-policy-list

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

[-] frunch@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Thanks bot 🍻

this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024

102 points (94.7% liked)

politics

19145 readers

4637 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News