How much of an idiot do you have to be to attack Wikipedia?
I think Hanlons razor is in desperate need of an update, since its premise seems to be based entirely on naivity. These days everything happening on the internet seems more like: "Never attribute to stupidity that which is adequately explained by malice".
So much malice.
So ~~right~~ correct.
Could also be state sponsored actors making alot of noise/work to get their more damagong edits through
same amount as the people attacking the internet archive
How can we still be surprised by this? We see republicans routinely making a sport out of who can bomb and take a shit on the helpful parts of society every day.
There is no bottom.
I mean, you're right. No disagreement. This is just what 20% of people do, and a different 40% think that you're the real asshole if you try to stop them or even just point out it's bad.
There is a group of people who have been systematically dismantling education, making access to information harder, and generally known to fuck shit up because they want to punish people who don't agree with them.
I got permabanned from Reddit for saying, about someone who destroyed a public library: "I wish we could bring back old-school stocks as punishment for whoever did this so the whole town could line up to throw rotten vegetables at them." Apperently, that's so radically violent that they had to permaban me.
Why would some one do this? Wikipedia its a mark in internet history
People fuck with Wikipedia all the time. It's honestly a wonder that it is usable at all and not a wasteland of defaced articles and bullshit. It is a real testament to the volunteers that keep it up.
Its much funnier to destroy than to create.
We are still monkeys throwing shit around.
Many of us are. Some of us are not.
Instead of feces we throw ink around. Man is the statutory ape.
-Robert anton wilson(paraphrased)
"The power to destroy a thing is the absolute control over it"
No it isn't. The power to make it the way you want or destroy it is.
Also some Russian hackers brought down the Internet Archive
Awhile ago russians were harassing OpenStreetMap by fucking up the data, but the heroic volunteers fixed that quite quickly and kept a close eye on edits.
Fuck people who ruin cool and nice things. And even though some of this kind of malice is state funded, I still blame the asshats for putting money before anything else and taking these jobs. If everyone acted like these assholes their lives would be miserable too.
The biggest threat to OSM these days is PokΓ©mon Go and hostile take overs.
Is there any indication they come from Russia?
The hacker group is ππ_πππππππππ according to their Profile, they are in Staraya Russa, Novgorod region
But! It might be a false flag.
Thanks for additional info!
That's interesting, actually. I can't see why Russia the state would be interested in this (it already has issues accessing certain sources, so messing with a free open library is shooting oneself in the foot), so it's either truly for the lulz (which are probably the most questionable lulz in history), or there's some truly mastermind plot behind this.
Great. First it was the Internet Archive, now Wikipedia.
AI is the nuke of the World Information War 1
Whoa
Don't worry, it's not as bad as the title suggests. The attack on Internet Archive is far, far worse. It's obviously a bit of a problem, though.
Hey this guy is one of the bots posting AI content, get him!
Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip
Icon attribution | Banner attribution