-47

Obama’s Admonishing Tone to Black Men Presents a Risk for Democrats (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 2 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Paywall removed https://archive.is/Y5vE1

top 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago

Sigh. The man was elected President twice and people still feel compelled to tell him to watch his tone....

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

I watched the speech. He wasn't "admonishing" anyone, as these idiotic headlines keep saying. He wasn't belittling anyone, he wasnt being patronizing, he was just trying to relate a specific position and point out why it would not be in their best interest.

[-] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Yeah, I don't get it. I thought what he had to say was, as usual, extremely prescient. I don't see how any reasonable person would take offense to it.

[-] abff08f4813c@j4vcdedmiokf56h3ho4t62mlku.srv.us 1 points 2 months ago

Thank you for this. I felt something was off, and now I know why.

[-] anticolonialist@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago

You must have watched it through the eyes of a white man. I have yet to see any post from the black community that doesn't see it as him talking down to black men as if he's the plantation whipper.

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world -4 points 2 months ago

Go to the 1 hour 40 minute mark to hear a leftists view on it... https://www.youtube.com/live/bA4NjJ8Iqjs

[-] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 months ago

Did you really watch 3+ hours of that?

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

She's live, I had it on in the background while I worked out and cooked dinner.

[-] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago

I appreciate her fiery rhetoric. She's talented. But a vote for Jill Stein is a wasted vote.

The problem is the election structure. The Electoral College, and, First Past the Post.

[-] mashbooq@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

"leftist"

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

If Obama simply drawing a contrast between the two major candidates, and why one candidate is a terrible choice for a specific group of people causes said group to take offense, we're well and truly fucked.

He's a black man who has been at the highest office in American politics, so he sure knows what he's talking about. Seems like his opinion on the matter should be taken into consideration.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Lecturing people into voting is what the Clinton campaign tried in 2016.

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago

New York Times - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

Information for New York Times:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.News

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/us/politics/obama-harris-trump-speech.html

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024

-47 points (17.8% liked)

politics

19233 readers

2509 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News