92
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] zante@lemmy.wtf 8 points 1 week ago

You can’t make me pick one.

[-] weeeeum@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

"In the interest of user safety and security..."

Always before some dumb new draconian shit

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago

Mandatory "hide the opt-out if there's even an opt-out at all" "AI" trash that is shoved into everything from operating systems to browsers. It's less than useless, outright malicious in both intent and practice in many cases, and dumps more carbon into the air just so the "AI" trash doesn't seem like a sunk cost investment for venture capitalists.

[-] mitrosus@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 week ago
[-] Flyberius@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago

There's this advert on YouTube shorts for some therapy app or service whatever and it's just vulgar.

It's this bearded dude filming himself washing his face and I guess the camera POV is on his basin or whatever.

The whole thing is meant to come across as though he is an influencer that you've not heard of, that this is a random video of his that you've stumbled across, and that this is just an observation that he's made about therapy that he's relaying to you whilst he exfoliates his putrid flesh.

I've nothing against therapy at all, but this commodification of it, and the way it dishonestly tries to sell it to you is simply capitalism all over. Most people probably need therapy because of the trauma this system has caused on people and yet here it is trying to sell you the cure as well.

To top it all off, watching this 2010s hipster relic scrub his face with soap is nail curlingly vile and I have no idea what the angle is other than trying to make this not appear to be an advert.

[-] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

Putrid flesh ? Is he a zombie ?

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Is the answer not chattel slavery?

[-] Melonpoly@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago
[-] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Federal Circuit court blocking the ban on noncompete agreements

[-] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago

Did OP ask an LLM for the "most Lemmy question to ask"?

[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

Neocolonialism maybe?

[-] eatham@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
92 points (92.6% liked)

Asklemmy

43691 readers
2160 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS