130
As the Prince of Persia Metroidvania team disbands, Baldur's Gate 3 dev says if Ubisoft wants "subs over sales" then "developers must get used to not having jobs" (www.gamesradar.com)
submitted 1 day ago by inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world to c/pcgaming@lemmy.world
20 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Badabinski@kbin.earth 43 points 1 day ago

This headline is... well, not great. Here's the entire quote from Larian Studios' publishing director:

The last notable game on their platform was arguably Far Cry 6 in 2021. The Crew, Mirage and Avatar came in 2023 and didn’t perform, so you can assume subscriptions were at a lull when PoP released by 2024. Which means people wouldn’t be launching their store all too much.

If it had released on Steam not only would it have been a market success, but there would likely be a sequel because the team are so strong. It’s such a broken strategy. The hardest thing is to make a 85+ game — it is much, much easier to release one. It just shouldn’t be done as it was. If the statement “gamers should get used to not owning their games” is true because of a specific release strategy (sub above sales), then the statement “developers must get used to not having jobs if they make a critically acclaimed game” (platform strategy above title sales) is also true, and that just isn’t sensible — even from a business perspective.

I dunno. That's hopefully less misleading and confusing? The article really doesn't bring much to the table imo.

Anyways, fuck Ubisoft.

[-] Infynis@midwest.social 13 points 1 day ago

So Larian is calling attention to predatory employment practices, as they have done before, and this time they're doing it by comparing the situation to predatory sales practices, and criticizing them in the comparison

[-] DarkThoughts@fedia.io -1 points 1 day ago

Still confusing as hell.

[-] Outtatime@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The size of some of these game dev teams are ridiculous. Better games can be made with less than half the people working on it. Also, screw gaming subscriptions. Greedy fuckers.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I hope they go start up indie studios. Fuck Ubisoft.

[-] Grass@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

it was time to unionize a decade or two ago

[-] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Indie ftw. Could developers negotiate for % of royalty/subs income?

[-] Mandy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Of all the problems the industry has.
Needing to make ALL THE MONEY POSSIBLE, which make pretty much all sales look like they are underperforming

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Lol, lmao they deserve it for saying such asinine shit.

[-] switchboard_pete@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago

it's not the devs saying it, but it's the devs who are punished

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Never said the devs did. Ubisoft execs said it and they deserve it.

[-] switchboard_pete@fedia.io 4 points 1 day ago

the quote is literally "developers must get used to not having jobs"

execs aren't the ones losing jobs with layoffs

[-] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 day ago

If the statement “gamers should get used to not owning their games” is true because of a specific release strategy (sub above sales), then the statement “developers must get used to not having jobs if they make a critically acclaimed game” (platform strategy above title sales) is also true, and that just isn’t sensible — even from a business perspective.

The Larian guy isn't saying the quote seriously. He's saying it's the natural conclusion of the Ubisoft strategy and that it's bad for everyone, so Ubisoft better change their strategy.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Execs are the ones ordering the layoffs. The devs can make a worker co-op since they are the ones that actually produce shit.

[-] switchboard_pete@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago

note that even in your fantasy the execs aren't losing out

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Losing all their employees is not losing out, right.

[-] switchboard_pete@fedia.io 0 points 1 day ago

correct, because they'll just wriggle off to another company

you know you can just admit you read the title wrong and said something stupid, rather than doubling down? rather than pretending you meant something completely different

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

Yeah I dont regret what I said. Ubisoft deserves to lose all its developers. Contrary to your belief, this will not kill the devs. Tech industries in general would benefit from alternative forms of management in business. They should all lose their jobs, and make a worker co-op that Ubisoft has no rights to. But go off, Pete, you sassy ancap.

[-] switchboard_pete@fedia.io 0 points 1 day ago

workers losing their jobs while executives keep theirs is bad

"go off sassy ancap" good lord it's like talking to a child

have a good one, mate

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Well as long as the workers have Stockholm syndrome and dont want to leave then yeah. But if you sap the talent out of a place, that talent wasn't rented by the worker from the company. They take it with them. You're under the impression these devs will go home and just sit on the floor. Not at all.

this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
130 points (95.1% liked)

PCGaming

6445 readers
36 users here now

Rule 0: Be civil

Rule #1: No spam, porn, or facilitating piracy

Rule #2: No advertisements

Rule #3: No memes, PCMR language, or low-effort posts/comments

Rule #4: No tech support or game help questions

Rule #5: No questions about building/buying computers, hardware, peripherals, furniture, etc.

Rule #6: No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.

Rule #7: No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts

Rule #8: No off-topic posts/comments

Rule #9: Use the original source, no editorialized titles, no duplicates

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
CSFFlame@lemmy.world