211
submitted 1 month ago by 1hitsong@lemmy.ml to c/jellyfin@lemmy.ml
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] tkw8@lemm.ee 53 points 1 month ago

I canโ€™t really think of a better example of open source software than Jellyfin. The product, the team, the cultureโ€ฆ always evolving and improving. Iโ€™m here for it!

[-] doctortran@lemm.ee 19 points 1 month ago

Not to mention its birth. It's the best example I can think of for how open source is supposed to work: it started as Emby, the Emby devs tried to close it off for profit, and the community fork became Jellyfin, which I'd argue has more than outgrown Emby.

You barely even hear about it anymore, it's only ever Plex or Jellyfin.

[-] corroded@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I use Jellyfin heavily, and it's a fantastic project, but I really wish they would address the issues with transcoding, specifically the ability to force it on.

My library contains a decent amount of HDR (lots of DV) content. On my TVs (using Nvidia Shield), it will direct play the DV content, resulting in a green picture. If I turn on burned-in subtitles or drop the bitrate and FORCE it to transcode, it's looks perfect. I've resorted to just setting a low bitrate on clients so it always transcodes.

I'm really hoping a future version gives us the ability to set more fine-grained transcoding settings per-client. Even the ability to disable direct-play completely would be fantastic.

[-] CCMan1701A@startrek.website 7 points 1 month ago

I think you can do some settings related to transcoding per user account. Maybe that will help.

[-] entropicdrift 3 points 1 month ago

10.10 included much better HDR format specificity and support. It's possible your issue was fixed.

[-] jasep@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

This is great, but as someone who uses the Jellyfin4Kodi plugin daily: ๐Ÿ˜ฌ๐Ÿ˜ฌ๐Ÿ˜ฌ

[-] domi@lemmy.secnd.me 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Thanks for the heads up. Sounds like I will be staying on 10.9 for a little bit longer.

[-] Froghut@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Being able to save trickplay images in the media folders is my most awaited feature, awesome! Edit: the setting can be found in the library settings, just fyi

[-] gilindoeslemmy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Network path substitution is my jam and I am super bummed to not be able to use it. I love direct play capabilities for my clients so I am worried about upgrading to this version.

[-] SatyrSack@feddit.org 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Did they abandon the Flatpak package? The Jellyfin Player Flatpak is up-to-date, but the Server package on Flathub is at 10.8.13 and no longer listed on the Jellyfin website

https://jellyfin.org/downloads/server

EDIT: Looking at an archive from earlier this year, the Flatpak was tagged as "Community", not "Official". So I guess I shouldn't be too surprised that the random packagers did not keep up with releases.

https://web.archive.org/web/20240104000907/https://jellyfin.org/downloads/server/

[-] krolden@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago

Flatpaks really suck for anything other than GUI applications. I suggest going with docker/podman

[-] SatyrSack@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago

I had no issue with it when I set it up on my Steam Deck. Setting up docker/podman through distrobox or something just seems like so much extra hassle compared to a Flatpak.

[-] doctortran@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You're running the server from the Steam deck?

Because even without Flatpak, there's plenty of other package for different distros that are easy or easier than flatpak. You don't have to go all the way to a docker.

It's probably best to do it eventually but it doesn't have to be today.

[-] SatyrSack@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago

Yes, installing/running Jellyfin Server on Steam Deck. What would be the best way to install on an immutable OS like SteamOS where Flatpak is typically the go-to?

[-] dessalines@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

The jellyfin docker is really easy to set up. And then you get the benefit of complete portability.

[-] krolden@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If you really want it as a flatpak you could attempt to build your own with up to date versions. However that would likely take longer than using an official package.

[-] AMillionMonkeys@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

So this WON'T break the "Jellyfin" Kodi plugin? Just making sure it's not the same thing as "Jellyfin4Kodi".

[-] domi@lemmy.secnd.me 2 points 1 month ago

If you use the native mode in the Jellyfin Kodi plugin to play directly from a network share, it will break.

[-] AMillionMonkeys@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Ah, okay. I'll hold off on updating then (I think I'm using native mode, but I can't remember).

[-] wizzim@infosec.pub -3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

In the GitHub release, it is written: This release is still building. Please do not attempt upgrades until this section is removed.

What does it mean? When will I be able to upgrade my installation?

[-] dadarobot 34 points 1 month ago

It means it is still building. You can upgrade your installation when that section is removed.

[-] wizzim@infosec.pub 2 points 1 month ago

๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

Thanks, I was confused!

this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
211 points (99.1% liked)

Jellyfin: The Free Software Media System

5802 readers
61 users here now

Current stable release: 10.10.3

Community Standards

Website

Forum

GitHub

Documentation

Feature Requests

Matrix (General Information & Help)

Matrix (Announcements)

Matrix (General Development)

Matrix (Off-Topic) - Come get to know the team and blow off steam!

Matrix Space - List of all the available rooms on Matrix.

Discord - Bridged to our Matrix rooms

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS