wizzim

joined 2 years ago
[–] wizzim@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Very interesting read! One thing I don't understand is this:

The ActionMutator targets custom GitHub Actions by force-pushing trojanized commits to their semver tags. Any downstream workflow that references uses: owner/action@v1 gets the compromised version next time it runs.

Does it mean we should not use Semver when referring to the actions? We should be using the action hash instead?

Or maybe the Semver with a version including the patch level?

[–] wizzim@infosec.pub 2 points 2 weeks ago

If this is a raffle, I am in too !

[–] wizzim@infosec.pub 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

True. The readme claims Battlefield 2142 is supported, but on Protondb it's still botched, because of EA's Javelin anti cheat.

[–] wizzim@infosec.pub 5 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I can confirm the ultimate 2C is awesome.

Did you manage to get extra buttons working? I thought no driver could handle those buttons (tried xpad and xone).

[–] wizzim@infosec.pub 3 points 10 months ago

Try to get the deluxe version with the Mooncrash DLC, as the DLC alone is often expensive.

[–] wizzim@infosec.pub 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

#SUTOM #1314 6/6

🟥🟦🟦🟦🟦🟡🟦🟦🟦
🟥🟡🟡🟡🟡🟦🟦🟡🟦
🟥🟡🟡🟦🟦🟦🟦🟥🟦
🟥🟡🟡🟡🟡🟦🟦🟦🟥
🟥🟥🟥🟦🟡🟡🟡🟡🟦
🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥

https://sutom.nocle.fr/

Chaud patate 🥔

[–] wizzim@infosec.pub 12 points 10 months ago

Linux does support TPM and secure boot: https://wiki/ .debian.org/SecureBoot#What_is_UEFI_Secure_Boot.3F

So the problem is really only about kernel level anticheat, not the secure boot itself ?

[–] wizzim@infosec.pub 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

La guerre des étoiles épisode 1.

J'étais un giga fan de Star Wars et overhypé.

Le film était un screener en anglais sans sous-titres et je ne captais rien. L'intrigue pourrie à base d'embargo commercial n'aidant pas.

Star Wars est mort pour moi ce jour là.

[–] wizzim@infosec.pub 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I am not a C developer, but I found the "helper has a terrible name" and "it's not clear what the helper is doing" arguments a bit weak.

Who in they right mind does not think the helper creates a 32 bytes word by putting the 16 bytes of the first argument followed by the 16 bytes of the second one ?

[–] wizzim@infosec.pub 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I am not sure about this conspiracy theory of yours: Microsoft does not want third party applications in the kernel space anymore.

https://www.theverge.com/news/692637/microsoft-windows-kernel-antivirus-changes

[–] wizzim@infosec.pub 2 points 10 months ago

I don't understand this point.

Linux does support TPM and secure boot: https://wiki.debian.org/SecureBoot#What_is_UEFI_Secure_Boot.3F

I thought the problem for Linux players was "just" the kernel anticheat ?

5
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by wizzim@infosec.pub to c/requests@lemmit.online
view more: next ›