dessalines

joined 7 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You can't simply say "we must assume" as evidence.

Okay yeah you definitely didn't read it. Large sections in that doc just before that are on phone number identifiers, NSLs, and 5-eyes countries, the US goverment pushing signal in privacy spaces... literally the reasons why signal isn't trustworthy. Unless you can tell me what an NSL is, then I'll assume you didn't read it.

While there may be other US government requests they are not alllwed to disclose, they were legally required to provide the same information to the courts, and we can see what they provided.

Did you ignore the large section on NSLs? These come with a gag order, meaning its illegal for signal to notify their users about them being spied on.

In fact, they implemented "Sealed sender" in 2018 where they are not able to see who the message is being sent to.

This is a "just trust me" from signal, since neither of us have access to their centralized DB, but you also ignored two paragraphs down, where it showed that with message timestamps and recipient information, this would be trivial to find the real sender of a message, regardless of sealed sender. Again, actually open source software can't say "just trust me" like signal can, we actually have to show code to prove it, and let people run that code in a private manner.

And sure, while the US government funds Signal, you know who else endorses it? Edward fucking Snowden. If anyone knows about secure messaging, it's the man that physically removes the microphone and camera from his phones before using them.

Elon musk and jack dorsey also endorse signal. An endorsement means nothing, especially for centralized software based in a 5-eyes country.

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Read the linked doc, because it's clear you didn't.

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (8 children)

Signal is a centralized, US-based service which requires your phone number (thus your real identity, IE name and address), has social networking graphs of everyone you talk to, and must forward that information to the US government when asked, as well as (by law) not tell you that they've been asked to do so. During the Obama era, 60 NSLs were issued for this private information every single day.

People overlook its privacy concerns for the same reason they do with apple: it has a shiny interface and is easy to use, and makes people very attached to it. Behind all that, is a surveillance network that its creators have explicitly said they do not want it to be able to run in a decentralized, private manner.

It has a long history of privacy offenses below (such as refusing to publish its server's source code for years, its reliance on other US tech services (amazon, google), US-government funding, and a US-defense-tank friendly administration) which get ignored or shouted down by many of those above. See the article below.

Why not signal.

Pretty much any alternative is better, as long as its not hosted in a five-eyes country, and especially if it doesn't require phone numbers or real identities like signal does.

I personally have been using SimpleX for friends and real life contacts, and Matrix for larger more anonymous group chats.

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 days ago

For a good intro to unequal exchange, and imperialism in the modern era, without reading a larger book, here's a really good article: John Smith - the GDP illusion

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, the ACA was really a program to force people without insurance to pay private insurance companies, and on the other side they could no longer deny people. There was nothing progressive or positive about further entrenching this parasitic industry, and the ACA did nothing to reverse the trend of increasing healthcare costs.

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

5m seems about right. Lemmy's from scratch builds are ~3.5m on a fast machine, and we have ~60k lines of code, and are using some with large libraries with lots of features enabled.

But you really should only ever have to do a from scratch build either at the beginning, or when you deploy. When developing, your IDE should only ever really run check or clippy, which should take seconds at most.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/50195159

This phenomenal paper from 1986 compares the quality of life (called in the article PQL, including indicators like health, life expectancy, daily per capita calories, infant mortality rate, etc), and finds that socialism outperforms capitalism in nearly all cases for comparisons of countries with similar ecomomic development.

Abstract from jstor:

This study compared capitalist and socialist countries in measures of the physical quality of life (PQL), taking into account the level of economic development. The World Bank was the principal source of statistical data, which pertained to 123 countries and approximately 97 percent of the world's population. PQL variables included (1) indicators of health, health services, demographic conditions, and nutrition (infant mortality rate, child death rate, life expectancy, crude death rate, crude birth rate, population per physician, population per nursing person, and daily per capita calorie supply); (2) measures of education (adult literacy rate, enrollment in secondary education, and enrollment in higher education); and (3) a composite PQL index. All PQL measures improved as economic development increased. In 30 of 36 comparisons between countries at similar levels of economic development, socialist countries showed more favorable PQL outcomes (p < .05 by two-tailed t-test). This work with the World Bank's raw data included cross-tabulations, analysis of variance, and regression techniques, which all confirmed the same conclusions. The data indicated that the socialist countries generally have achieved better PQL outcomes than the capitalist countries at equivalent levels of economic development.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/50195159

This phenomenal paper from 1986 compares the quality of life (called in the article PQL, including indicators like health, life expectancy, daily per capita calories, infant mortality rate, etc), and finds that socialism outperforms capitalism in nearly all cases for comparisons of countries with similar ecomomic development.

Abstract from jstor:

This study compared capitalist and socialist countries in measures of the physical quality of life (PQL), taking into account the level of economic development. The World Bank was the principal source of statistical data, which pertained to 123 countries and approximately 97 percent of the world's population. PQL variables included (1) indicators of health, health services, demographic conditions, and nutrition (infant mortality rate, child death rate, life expectancy, crude death rate, crude birth rate, population per physician, population per nursing person, and daily per capita calorie supply); (2) measures of education (adult literacy rate, enrollment in secondary education, and enrollment in higher education); and (3) a composite PQL index. All PQL measures improved as economic development increased. In 30 of 36 comparisons between countries at similar levels of economic development, socialist countries showed more favorable PQL outcomes (p < .05 by two-tailed t-test). This work with the World Bank's raw data included cross-tabulations, analysis of variance, and regression techniques, which all confirmed the same conclusions. The data indicated that the socialist countries generally have achieved better PQL outcomes than the capitalist countries at equivalent levels of economic development.

 

This phenomenal paper from 1986 compares the quality of life (called in the article PQL, including indicators like health, life expectancy, daily per capita calories, infant mortality rate, etc), and finds that socialism outperforms capitalism in nearly all cases for comparisons of countries with similar ecomomic development.

Abstract from jstor:

This study compared capitalist and socialist countries in measures of the physical quality of life (PQL), taking into account the level of economic development. The World Bank was the principal source of statistical data, which pertained to 123 countries and approximately 97 percent of the world's population. PQL variables included (1) indicators of health, health services, demographic conditions, and nutrition (infant mortality rate, child death rate, life expectancy, crude death rate, crude birth rate, population per physician, population per nursing person, and daily per capita calorie supply); (2) measures of education (adult literacy rate, enrollment in secondary education, and enrollment in higher education); and (3) a composite PQL index. All PQL measures improved as economic development increased. In 30 of 36 comparisons between countries at similar levels of economic development, socialist countries showed more favorable PQL outcomes (p < .05 by two-tailed t-test). This work with the World Bank's raw data included cross-tabulations, analysis of variance, and regression techniques, which all confirmed the same conclusions. The data indicated that the socialist countries generally have achieved better PQL outcomes than the capitalist countries at equivalent levels of economic development.

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

This is pretty sad. Oneplus phones, tablets, and watches have like double the battery of samsung / apple, at 1/3rd of the cost. Hopefully OPPO will make another branding for europe at least, because the EU still does allow chinese smartphones to be sold there. The US can just isolate itself and force its people to buy $1500 smartphones.

Xiaomi, vivo, and oppo(oneplus's parent company) are growing pretty rapidly in market share at least.

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Same for me, + limewire and IRC channels, then torrents. There was a golden age in the 2000s where you'd see new albums and movies get released before they even came out, and in relatively good quality too.

This is anecdotal, but everyone I meet born after 2000 has no idea what torrents are, or how to share media, and many of them are paying for like 3 streaming services. They have no idea all this stuff is available for free without much effort, and with better quality.

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 days ago

It's not just having a "command economy", it's in whose interest the economy is being commanded for. The PRC went through an intense anti-colonial / communist revolution to disempower the feudalists and reactionaries, and capture the state to bring it under a worker-peasant control.

If western nations want to repeat the success of the PRC, they need to repeat China's steps from 1949. They would each need to go through violent revolutions to capture the state and overthrow bourgeois democracy. Otherwise, capitalists will still hold power, and their economies will be commanded to suit capitalist interests.

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Cool article, I wasn't on any of these private trackers, but I remember them getting shut down.

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 23 points 4 days ago

Competent vs incompetent managers of empire.

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 days ago

We don't allow vibe-coding for lemmy, see here.

 
view more: next ›