471
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by K1nsey6@lemmy.world to c/latestagecapitalism@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Fester@lemm.ee 89 points 3 weeks ago

“So what you’re saying is we need to move further to the right.”

  • Democrats and pundits
[-] freshcow@lemmy.world 39 points 3 weeks ago

Exactly the message I expect them to take away from this, if 2016 and 2020 are any indication. Zero introspection.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Our constituents' rent went up 15% and their wages stayed the same, so everything is basically ok.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] paysrenttobirds@sh.itjust.works 69 points 3 weeks ago

To be fair, the Republicans did all these same things and won all three branches, so...

[-] AFaithfulNihilist@lemmy.world 43 points 3 weeks ago

It shouldn't have to be repeated so often that maybe Republican voters aren't who the Democratic party needs to be gearing itself to attract.

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 37 points 3 weeks ago

Turns out people who want those things can vote for Republicans. Who offer more of those things!

And the people who did not want those things stayed home.

[-] Uruanna@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago

Because right wingers want that and left wingers don't, that's some surprising maths.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

Republicans had a primary.

[-] inv3r510n@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

This point needs to be driven home over and over and over again. The democrats haven’t held a real primary where the DNC operatives weren’t interfering since 2008! which coincided with the election in a landslide of Obama after he won an extremely competitive primary.

Democrats learned the wrong lesson from that election, they thought it was identity politics that won the landslide. No idiots, it was democracy itself. Of course being the first black man to be president helped him but having an appealing platform that outcompeted everyone else’s (and a better record re Iraq war, he voted against it as senator unlike Clinton) won him the popular mandate that led to the landslide in the general. Against a formidable candidate! John McCain was no joke and I think todays democrats and even progressives would be thrilled to have him as president if he were still alive compared to our current options.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 33 points 2 weeks ago

There is no single group of people on the planet Earth as adept at shitting and falling back in it as the Democrats.

They turned "Snatching Defeat from the Jaws of Victory" into an artform.

[-] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 11 points 2 weeks ago

This why people think they are a psyop.

[-] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

I don't need convincing. They showed me in 2016 that they're controlled opposition. Admitted it in court.

Wilding v. DNC Services Corp.

Google it for yourself.

[-] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago

I don't think there has ever, in history, been a group capable of doing that at this scale other than the Democratic Party. They are the greatest to ever do it.

[-] SoJB@lemmy.ml 29 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Stop it Patrick, you’re scaring the liberals. Imagine how shocking it must be for reality to prove that the leftists were correct about everything this entire time. Again.

Really weird how leftists have a 100% accuracy rate about all of history going back 150 years, but I’m sure the liberals will take some Ws eventually.

Just keep barreling towards fascism, libs! I believe in you!

[-] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 27 points 3 weeks ago

“Voters voted for the choice furthest to the right because they wanted the choice on the left to be more left”

[-] BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca 46 points 3 weeks ago

People didn't vote. Significantly less turnout this year than 2020. Further left is more exciting than an idiot chasing endorsement from Republicans.

It's stupid, but if people weren't stupid Trump wouldn't have been a candidate.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

Yes. People want a populous movement. In the absence of left-wing populism (like socialist reforms), they will take right win populism (fascism).

[-] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Democrats campaigned on making billionaires pay their fair share and addressing health care and student loans etc so socialist reforms. But the majority of voters were still convinced that that would make them worse off unfortunately.

[-] BlueMacaw@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

That might have been in the footnotes of the DNC platform, but Kamala said none of that.

Here's a quote from Stephen Semler's newsletter:

For example, in this video clip, Stephen Colbert asks Harris, "Under a Harris administration, what would the major changes be and what would stay the same?" Harris replies: "Sure. Well, I mean, I'm obviously not Joe Biden. So that would be one change. But also I think it's important to say with 28 days to go, I'm not Donald Trump."

First, that doesn’t answer the question. Second, that description applies to literally everyone except for Joe Biden and Donald Trump. This is the quality of candidate you get when the Democratic Party chooses one for you.

https://www.stephensemler.com/p/a-couple-charts-to-explain-a-harris?publication_id=37298&post_id=151256232>>

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Did they? If they did, then they did a terrible job of it, since many people didn't hear that message. The message that everyone heard over and over again is "I'm not trump". Besides, promising to get rid of student loans as a campaign promise when you just spent 4 years proving that you can't really deliver on that promise seems unwise.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Key word being, "addressing." Medicare for All? Nope. They're going to address healthcare costs. Student loans insanely expensive for the majority of Americans? They already tried addressing it. What are they going to do? Eliminate the filibuster to pass legislation? Stack the Supreme Court?

They've been a little better on taxing the wealthy, but raising taxes doesn't mean much if you believe the revenue is going towards the military industrial complex or, "woke," agenda, based on your political leanings.

Liberal half measures aren't going to work anymore. They need a full-blown progressive agenda and the balls to ram it through whatever institution is in their way.

load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Saleh@feddit.org 8 points 2 weeks ago

Less people voted Trump in 2024 than in 2020. It is not that Trump won, it is that Biden/Harris lost hard.

Trump: 74 Mio. in 2020, 73 Mio. in 2024

Biden/Harris: 81 Mio. in 2020, 69 Mio. in 2024

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_United_States_presidential_election

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_United_States_presidential_election

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (32 replies)
[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 19 points 3 weeks ago

Either you are able to vote on harm reduction alone, knowing that your pick isn't ideal...

Or you are so ideologically locked in that nothing but "your brand" is enough.

Harris sucks but the vote was to keep MORE, NEW people from being at risk.

[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

Republicans always seem to win with shitty candidates because they understand this intrinsically. They do not care that DJT is an utter buffoon, they care that he will enact the shit they want, and now they're getting it because they refused to stay home. As the saying goes: Democrats want to fall in love, Republicans want to fall in line.

So Republicans backed their guy, just like they did the last two elections, and there was no line that could not be crossed that would convince even a fraction of Republicans to not vote. Meanwhile, virtue signaling lefties desperately tried to convince me for months that I shouldn't vote for Biden OR Harris because they were both equally culpable for a genocide that is happening halfway across the world, as if Trump would have been any better.

Yeah, we absolutely deserve to be punished for this. We let this happen. If Dems could actually get a solid trifecta in the government, we might have a shot at actually reversing some of the damage that has been accumulating since Reagan, but that requires people to set aside their purity tests and hold their noses at the ballot box. The real elitists are the Democratic base who feel personally slighted at the idea of compromise or harm reduction.

[-] Saleh@feddit.org 9 points 2 weeks ago

There were 14 Presidents since FDR. And many of the Democratic ones had ample possibility to enact progressive laws and chose not to.

You keep claiming that people like Clinton, Obama, Clinton, Biden or Harris are "left", but they are center-right, in many aspects far right by European standards.

People don't vote "perfect" also not on the left. They vote "this is current issues, who addresses these issues?" Trump pretending to care about working class people helped him. Biden/Harris made a point of alienating everyone that is against genocide, which should be a nobrainer for progressive politics, and also peddling racist messages with bragging about their deportation numbers.

The idea that the center to far right Democrats would actually bring any leftist solution is laughable. They haven proven time and time again, that they are the party of maintaining the neoliberal and imperial status quo.

The solution is to offer a progressive solution against the reactionary solution, so people can rally around your progressive solution. Providing no solution and denying the problems is a surefire way to demotivate and disengage people. Someone who wants genocide, deportations and neoliberal economics can always vote the Republicans. And the Republicans can succesfully further the image of the Democrats being the billionaire cultural elite party, while the Reps are the billionaire "hard working" party, peddling the lie of the American dream. But it can be peddled to Joe and Jose in the milling plant.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 weeks ago

Trump won both times because he departed from GOP ideology, not his voters. Harm reduction doesn't get voters to the polls.

This isn't about you and me. A campaign centered around "stop this person" is just less effective than one centered around "let's start doing this".

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

This is the second time in a decade that the liberal establishment expected the US voting public to actually do something about all the fascism they themselves don't seem to actually want or can do anything about.

The "Vote Harder!" brigade was warned about this - at one point or the other, "lesser evilism" is going to hit rock-bottom.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

I don't get it. Yeah all of these things are horrible but the other choice is literally Hitler. We could say the same thing about them but we didn't win

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 weeks ago

The term "literally Hitler" is a lot less impactful when democrats have been complicit in genocide for an entire year.

If Trump did what Biden did, I have no doubt you would have called him literally Hitler for it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Stern@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries

Primaries happened. Biden won it, Harris likely wouldn't have, but by the time Joe dipped it was too late to do the process again.

[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

Oh, you mean the primary where no one else had universal ballot access? Where there was only one actually viable challenger, Dean Phillips, who the Democrats drove out of politics afterwards? That primary?

Like, FFS, even the pundit class doesn't pretend that was a serious primary. Stop pretending a ceremonial vote means something.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
471 points (82.2% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

247 readers
339 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' etc.

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS