'A19' and 'M5' Chips Discovered on Apple Backend Server (www.macrumors.com)

submitted 1 year ago by octalfudge@lemmy.world to c/apple_enthusiast@lemmy.world

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] revs@feddit.uk 17 points 1 year ago

Not surprising. It’s not as if companies only start on the next version once the current one is out. Things like this need planning years in advance. I think I heard on the ATP podcast that Apple are already planning and working on what the M7 will be.

Just because they are testing the M4/M5 doesn’t mean it’s ready, or can be fabricated at scale for an acceptable cost just yet.

[-] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

M5 lol. We ain’t even at M3 yet.

[+] Mongostein@lemmy.ca -27 points 1 year ago

It’s like when I read a book in the 90s that explained planned obsolescence in a child-friendly way.

[-] Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 year ago

When should have we stopped developing new processors and computing architectures? I just want to make sure that we never improve upon existing tools to avoid that pesky planned obsolescence.

Pentium? Core Duo? Core i7? AMD Ryzen? Apple M1?

[-] Mongostein@lemmy.ca -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Never, but the yearly iterations are there to keep people upgrading. Same thing with cars.

Some people need the newest hottest thing when they could upgrade every 5-7 years (10-15 in the case of cars) and be fine and companies cash in on that.

[-] Satelllliiiiiiiteeee@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

It was roughly 2 years between the M1 and M2 which is a longer time between generation refreshes than Intel and about on par with AMD. The A series updates roughly as often as the top tier Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 processors. Apple really isn't doing anything outside of industry norms here.

[-] bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

Doesn't really apply here, I'm perfectly happy with my m1 and will be for years. If Apple wanted to design these processors for planned obsolescence they wouldn't make them run so damn fast.

[-] The_Mixer_Dude@lemmus.org 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah I think what the guy above is missing is the concept that companies schedule certain performance aspects on a timer so that they can release things in the most financially beneficial release cycle with only enough performance benefit to maximize their sales numbers. People seem to think that tech companies like these are releasing their very best product at coincidentally regular intervals with surprisingly similar performance increases

[-] Nogami@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Nothing remarkable about putting placeholders for future products there. I’m sure iPhone 15 16 17 have all been registered on reddit Lemmy etc. as land grabs. this is no different, just put the stems in for the server.

this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023

34 points (90.5% liked)

Apple

17095 readers

63 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:

No NSFW Content
No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
No Ads / Spamming
Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

MichelleG@lemmy.world

RoyalEngineering@lemmy.world

thisisdee@lemmy.world