30
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] robinm@programming.dev 5 points 2 weeks ago

It's really nice to see this RFC progress

[-] snaggen@programming.dev 5 points 2 weeks ago

I think this would be a nice improvement to reduce boiler plate.

[-] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 4 points 2 weeks ago

Hmmm... I guess I don't see why not?

[-] d_k_bo@feddit.org 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

This is really great and would solve the problem that led me to create constructor-lite.

With this RFC, its usage could be replaced with

#[derive(Debug, PartialEq)]
struct Movie {
    title: String,
    year: Option<u16> = None,
}

assert_eq!(
    Movie { title: "Star Wars".to_owned(), .. },
    Movie { title: "Star Wars".to_owned(), year: None },
)

[-] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 2 points 2 weeks ago

Think you would need Movie { title: "Star Wars".to_owned(), .. }, the .. is mandatory.

[-] d_k_bo@feddit.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

Thanks, that was an oversight on my part.

this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2024
30 points (96.9% liked)

Rust

6137 readers
12 users here now

Welcome to the Rust community! This is a place to discuss about the Rust programming language.

Wormhole

!performance@programming.dev

Credits

  • The icon is a modified version of the official rust logo (changing the colors to a gradient and black background)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS