55
submitted 2 weeks ago by Troy@beehaw.org to c/science@beehaw.org

Brain structure can tell us a lot about reading skills. Importantly, though, the brain is malleable — it changes when we learn a new skill or practice an already acquired one.

For instance, young adults who studied language intensively increased their cortical thickness in language areas. Similarly, reading is likely to shape the structure of the left Heschl’s gyrus and temporal pole. So, if you want to keep your Heschl’s thick and thriving, pick up a good book and start reading.

[...] it’s worth considering what might happen to us as a species if skills like reading become less prioritised. Our capacity to interpret the world around us and understand the minds of others would surely diminish. In other words, that cosy moment with a book in your armchair isn’t just personal – it’s a service to humanity.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] drspod@lemmy.ml 24 points 2 weeks ago

it’s worth considering what might happen to us as a species if skills like reading become less prioritised. Our capacity to interpret the world around us and understand the minds of others would surely diminish.

Complete speculation. I hate when scientific articles end with a completely made-up supposition that's not supported by any of the evidence in the actual studies.

This view also betrays quite a discriminatory view of the illiterate, who by the way are perfectly capable of interpreting the world around us and understanding the minds of others.

[-] some_guy 5 points 2 weeks ago

Most people couldn’t read for most of human history and they did well enough to people the entire world.

[-] nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br 4 points 2 weeks ago

That view also diminishes the people who lived before writing was developed.

[-] modifier@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 weeks ago

Check out my thicc cortex baby. You like?

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 7 points 2 weeks ago

Good at reading or read more?

[-] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 17 points 2 weeks ago

I just finished digging into this so you don’t have to— his actual research article is the former (out of a cohort of 1200 people some scored higher on a test and after studying their brainMRIs there are some consistent differences).

The title and the stats about how much reading has declined in the UK from the conversation article seem to be just fluff for interest. The amount people read wasn’t a subject of the research (and wasn’t mentioned). I think the author was just trying to make his work more relatable but framing the article this way was a bad call imo.

this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
55 points (100.0% liked)

Science

13052 readers
33 users here now

Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS