Hardware

2257 readers

71 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.

Rules (Click to Expand):

Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about
Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.
No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.
Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.
Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).
If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.

Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Augmented Reality - !augmented_reality@lemmy.world
Gaming Laptops - !gaminglaptops@lemmy.world
Laptops - !laptops@lemmy.world
Linux Hardware - !linuxhardware@programming.dev
Mechanical Keyboards - !mechanical_keyboards@programming.dev
Microcontrollers - !microcontrollers@lemux.minnix.dev
Monitors - !monitors@lemm.ee
Raspberry Pi - !raspberry_pi@programming.dev
Retro Computing - !retrocomputing@lemmy.sdf.org
Single Board Computers - !sbcs@lemux.minnix.dev
Virtual Reality - !virtualreality@lemmy.world

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world

Rekall_Incorporated@lemm.ee

Qualcomm processors properly licensed from Arm, US jury finds (finance.yahoo.com)

submitted 5 months ago by golli@lemm.ee to c/hardware@lemmy.world

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Arm Holdings' lawsuit against Qualcomm ended on Friday with a jury delivering a mixed verdict that found for Qualcomm on a crucial issue, saying Qualcomm had properly licensed its central processor chips.

Arm's shares were down 1.9% in extended trading after the news, and Qualcomm's shares were up 2.3%.

Major loss for Arm, who started this whole thing, and now have nothing to show for, while also pissing off their customers (Qualcomm obviously, but probably also many others).

top 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

A seemingly big failure for ARM, they go after one of their own clients and then lose their case against them.

[–] golli@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Yeah. The whole move imo was already a play for short term profits over long term considerations regardless of the outcome. I guess after the sale to nvidia fell through Softbank wanted to make some fast money?

For what it's worth they are seemingly seeking a retrial source.

And on a side note i am quite fascinated how fast those Delaware courts are handlying big cases like these. Something i also noticed during the twitter sale.