I can't stop thinking about how one of the most desintegrating aspects of capitalist hegemony is how non-commodified alternatives to social practices/services (for example, internet forums) are always going to be decentralised, to the point where decentralisation itself is taken to be a good thing and communities build their collective identity around those alternatives. I believe that if those alternatives were possible in a centralised manner they'd be much better, specially for the non-"power users".
Fediverse is just a recent example of this, but informatics in specific (due to the global reach of the internet and neglible replication cost for software) is rife with the most extreme examples of this. Dozens of Linux distributions against Windows, self-hosted search engines against Google, the text editor wars itself that sadly resolved into VSCode dominance some decades later.
And when something becomes the "hegemon" of the alternatives, like Ubuntu or Firefox, the economic logic of society dictates that they either get swollen (redhat) or have to commodify themselves, and the cycle repeats itself.
In capitalism the only passive consolidating force is capital, and so everything else must be diffuse and divided.
I could try to turn this into a proper thesis but even in that I'd run against the current issue that search engines don't work anymore and it's much harder to intentionally browse the critical sections of the internet and I don't have the time and energy for that. I'm just tired of having to wade through a dozen possibly zombie projects every time I'm looking for an alternative to shit like Trello as if the concept of "online shared Kanban board" needs that much variety.
So I guess I'll just leave this here as a pseudotweet. The current state of the internet is depressing, but at least I'm glad I found lemmygrad.