this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2025
292 points (97.7% liked)

Steam

10808 readers
1017 users here now

Steam is a video game digital distribution service by Valve.

Steam News | Steam Beta Client news

Useful tools:
SteamDB
SteamCharts
Issue tracker for Linux version of Steam

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

so much to organize, damn you humble bundle

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tenkard@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

Yes, I've got then by genre, completed, to be played, "butt ugly indies" and "devil's lettuce approved"

[–] HoodieGyaru@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago

I categorize them based on their franchise. But if they're not part of any franchise or they're the only game I have they'd just be uncategorized.

[–] Spellbound@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Whoa I don't even know you can categorize steam games like this, thanks for showing

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RobotZap10000@feddit.nl 3 points 1 month ago

I only have 3: -TO PLAY -BANGERS -Uncategorized

[–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

I go by main genre - so Action, Adventure, RPG, ARPG, Rhythm, VR, you get it.

Then a Beaten, Beaten 100%, Shelved, "The Bin", and a "Multiplayer" category. Games are allowed in multiple categories. The Bin does not hold many games, you've gotta earn being thrown in the trash.

That way, when I think, "I wanna play a Rogue Like" I don't have to recall all their titles or anything. Then my Steam Deck came around and the default big picture view makes my sorting... Mostly useless.

[–] MoogMuskie@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

The majority of backlogs being in "other" is because you bought hundreds of games you don't remember buying or what genre they are, right? 😆

[–] atmur@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

Mostly games that don't fit into an existing category that I don't feel like creating a dedicated category for. Like I could create a stealth category for Thief and Hitman, but it would only contain those two games. Then there's games like Transistor, Cloudpunk, Spiritfarer, etc where I just don't know how I could even categorize them.

[–] anguo@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

I just sort my library by rating to see what I'll play next.

[–] lectricleopard@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Poor VR, all the way at the bottom below shovelware.

[–] atmur@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Very much intentional since I don't own a headset at the moment. If I ever get one again, I'll give the category an emoji to push it back towards the top lol

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

I am somewhat bad about organizing on Steam. All I have for categories are pretty much games I got for free, paid for indie titles, paid for non-indie titles, and emulators. Would be better if I better organized them, but I wouldn't know where to start and would most likely procrastinate on it indefinitely because of the number of things I have in library.

[–] Berttheduck@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

I feel you bundley pain. I have: favourites, check in future/ early access, completed, currently paying, deck games, escape rooms, games for my wife to try, horror, humble games to try, local multiplayer, multiplayer, new need to try, played kinda sucked, puzzle, RPG, RTS, shooter, sofa games, VR games.

New need to try is for the humble bundle games I'm actually interested in and the humble games to try is for the ones which are just extras.

[–] Shape4985@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

I dont have this many lists. I keep mine as finished, currently playing, broken and then some dynamic lists based on category such as rougelike, horror etc

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago
  • To Play
  • Finished
  • Unfinished (games I gave up on)
  • Time Sink (unending games, roguelikes, etc)
  • Multiplayer
  • Multiplayer (5+)
  • Local Multiplayer
[–] Harvey656@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Goals. Holy, I know what I'm doing tomorrow instead of gaming.

[–] shotgun_crab@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

I could never be this organized, but good for you tbh

[–] Horse@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 4 weeks ago

mine is just

  • Favorites
  • Multiplayer games my girlfriend also has
  • Everything else
[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

I just have unplayed, installed locally, and good games.

I often forget to update the good games folder so it's iffy as to whether or not all of my good games are in there yet at any given time.

[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 weeks ago

It would be cool to see an export of that game list by category.

Dunno if steam has any way of doing that

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Why would you sort the ones you're uninterested in?

I sort mine by genre, plus a couple categories that overlap with others like "Space" or "No Killing" because sometimes I get in the mood for a particular quality. I don't have an active category, instead I uninstall games that I don't see myself playing in the near future and then use the "Ready to Play" button to see the active ones. Installing games encourages me to do something else, and the limit on how long it'll be helps, "Do chores for an hour while your game installs" is a lot easier for me than just "Do chores." Ideally, I try to limit my installed games to 10 so that I think more about what I actually want to play, I'm not always disciplined about it.

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

I just sort by recent and that's it 🤷‍♂️ if it falls off and I forget about it, I guess it's gone

[–] padge@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 weeks ago

Mine is pretty similar, except I just throw my backlog into a big category called "Haven't Touched". Been meaning to make a separate folder for Early Access games I've temporarily dropped until they release.

[–] hushable@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I categorise them by genre, but only those I've played. Everything else is unsorted and my backlog is whatever I have installed and uncategorised.

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 weeks ago

I actually like that... Mostly I have categories for genres, publishers, and planning for playing (not like I actually follow it...) but I like some of yours and will probably adopt them

[–] siv9939@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I don't use categories, but I do keep a tab open with this loaded with my Steam ID. It uses all the tags games have on Steam so you can see if you have a 2D Sci-Fi Souls-like if you want.

[–] domi@lemmy.secnd.me 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So what are the 4 Souls-likes in your backlog?

[–] atmur@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sekiro, Code Vein, The Surge, and Steel Rising.

Honestly the first three are candidates for the "Dropped" category, I've started and given up on them before. I want to give them each one more chance at some point.

[–] domi@lemmy.secnd.me 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Would be a shame to drop Sekiro. Definitely one of the hardest souls games but very redeeming once you get the hang of it.

Code Vein is very rough around the edges but has a cool art style and interesting boss designs. Also has a banger soundtrack by Go Shiina, best known for Demon Slayer. Some of the boss themes go really hard. Pretty good in coop but probably wouldn't have finished it alone.

Did not enjoy The Surge and did not play Steel Rising.

[–] atmur@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My problem with most Souls-likes is the slow/clunky (for lack of a better word) combat. I've bounced off Code Vein, The Surge, and Elden Ring (which was a refund instead of a backlog) over this. I want to try them again with an open mind at some point though, just with adjusted expectations.

Sekiro on the other hand I really liked the combat of, the reason it got backlogged is because I got tired of fighting through all the grunt enemies between deaths to bosses/mini-bosses. I like difficult bosses if I can immediately try again upon death (a la Furi), but it felt like Sekiro was wasting my time in comparison because I had to GET to the boss again for each attempt. The grunts didn't pose enough of a challenge to be interesting, just enough to slow me down.

I'm not sure if that's a common thing throughout the game, or if it was just in the areas leading up to the point where I stopped, but I am definitely planning on giving it another shot either way. It's been a few years since I last played it.

[–] domi@lemmy.secnd.me 2 points 4 weeks ago

Most Souls-likes are slow and methodical, if that's not your thing you probably won't have fun with any of these except Sekiro. I would not call the official ones (Dark Souls, Elden Ring, ...) clunky but many of the "copies" certainly can be.

but it felt like Sekiro was wasting my time in comparison because I had to GET to the boss again for each attempt. The grunts didn't pose enough of a challenge to be interesting, just enough to slow me down.

You can rush past most enemies on your way to the boss and the difficult ones usually have a respawn point close but this is a problem with many From games. I bounced off Dark Souls 1 and Sekiro for similar reasons the first time I played them.

If you enjoy the boss fights you might enjoy Kannagi Usagi? It's essentially a carbon copy of the Sekiro bosses in a boss rush mode and with an anime skin. I have seen even the biggest Sekiro haters enjoy that one. Also, it's free and short. https://store.steampowered.com/app/2551500/__KANNAGI_USAGI/

[–] NostraDavid@programming.dev 1 points 3 weeks ago

I'm late to the party, but I've categorized them by year. If I feel nostalgic, I just browse the top of the list.

[–] Mk23simp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How is your early access category so small?

[–] atmur@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I avoid early access in general, so I've only ended up with a handful from game bundles.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›