481
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] tetris11@lemmy.ml 68 points 2 weeks ago

What does this mean for John Mastodon's grandkids?

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

Yes. He is not a an-i-mal.

[-] tetris11@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 weeks ago

I feel like you've answered the wrong comment, and this a-ni-mal(? am I saying that right?) refers to someone else

[-] mutant_zz@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago

This is a great move. Governance is extremely important for bigger OSS projects, and the "benevolent dictator" model has its limits.

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 20 points 2 weeks ago

Does this mean they'll fix all the things that Eugene refused to fix? Bullish on Eugene leaving mastodon

[-] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 10 points 2 weeks ago

Like what?

I do like to have full markdown support that is for sure.

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 3 points 2 weeks ago

Search. Downvotes. He has blocked those forever.

[-] andypiper@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

Search exists. I'm not sure downvotes make sense in the context of a microblogging app, but YMMV. There's a lot of things to work on, for sure.

load more comments (25 replies)
[-] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago

disliking posts on an app with no algorithm seems pointless

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rglullis@communick.news 20 points 2 weeks ago

We need to grow our annual operating budget to €5 million in 2025.

What for?

How many active users are going to be served by mastodon.social and mastodon.online? Is the infrastructure being provided by the companies counted as part of this budget?

How many more users are going to join the Mastodon network of servers thanks to the missing features that are planned to be released this year?

[-] andypiper@lemmy.world 72 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

there's a big difference between running a service on volunteers, and having full-time folks to keep things running / answer the regulation discussions / keep maintaining / keep adding the features that folks are looking for. This is not primarily an infrastructure spend. There's also an amount of legal work involved, unfortunately. So, those are some of the elements we're looking at.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 21 points 2 weeks ago

They are also the main developers of the Mastodon software. It is not just hosting the service. The software needs to be able to compete with Bluesky and right now it quite simply does not. The only way to get the quality needed is to have some full time lead developers. Also they need some proper admins to run the websites. Mastodon social is at 250,000 active users right now, but it is also fairly likely to grow fast with what Elon is up to with Twitter. Just to compare Twitter used to have 7500 employees, with a 1000 today.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] flamingos@feddit.uk 20 points 2 weeks ago

Surprised to see you of all people question why a project needs money to pay for things.

What for?

They said what for in the previous section, improving Mastodon's "usability, discoverability, and trust & safety". They tried to fundraise for a head of trust and safety last month, but failed. My impression is this is them trying to raise general donations to the project to pay for things like this, instead of individual campaigns for individual things.

Is the infrastructure being provided by the companies counted as part of this budget?

I thinks so, given the previous paragraph links to their sponsor page and says as such.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 weeks ago

it's not (only) for the instance. This is for paying full time jobs to manage and develop the software

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] atro_city@fedia.io 17 points 2 weeks ago

The existing US-based non-profit entity, the 501(c)(3), will continue to function as a fundraising hub.

Wait, is the money transferred to the US then back to the EU? And will the US-based non-profit still continue to exist or will it be replaced by a truly European one?

[-] andypiper@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The 501(c)(3) is a fundraising entity, and will continue to exist. There will be a new independent European non-profit that will "own" (for the want of a better word) the other entities. Legal structures and things are not my forte (IANAL), that's my understanding of what is happening in so far as I'm involved in the discussions and what I'm able to tell you.

[-] Olap@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

No mention of the name Mastodon and copyrights which I seem to recall is one of the bigger complaints

[-] andypiper@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

These are part of the assets that will be transferred from the GmbH to the non-profit.

[-] Olap@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Given the concern, it would be good to be explicit in the blog post. What other assets does it genuinely need? The code is open source, people are free to host instances

[-] andypiper@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

Checking about getting it updated.

[-] andypiper@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Olap@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Great news indeed then, go Mastodon!

Lemmy has the same issues I believe. Lots of people not exactly happy with the two core devs either

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2025
481 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

29348 readers
2479 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS