301
Stop asking (feddit.de)
submitted 1 year ago by atheist@feddit.de to c/atheism@feddit.de
all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

I mean this is a relatively easy question to answer. God is a cruel dictator. It doesn't really speak to if God can do those things, or if God is real. Only to God's character.

[-] oo1@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

if there was a god, then humans would be to him as lab rats to humans - except with more power and a greater degree of control.

If humans starve, torture, maim, infect, lobotomise, test bioweapons on the lab rats that they have near-godlike power over; then why expect elsewise from their god.

did you ever watch humans playing grand theft auto?

[-] hansl@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

The Old Testament God is clearly a harsh parent that will ask you to do inconsiderable things to prove your loyalty, and will just destroy whatever doesn’t fit his vision. He is not the good guy, nor the bad guy I guess. There’s no Hell or Satan in OT, right?

Anyway, I can only imagine a teenage having a fit that his terrarium’s humans aren’t behaving like he want them to, then growing out of his tantrums within a few years.

[-] GlendatheGayWitch@lib.lgbt 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, Satan appears as the snake in Genesis, goes up to God and cons him into a bet that Job will disavow God if everything is ripped away and God goes along with it. Hell, I believe is referenced a few times as Sheol. In the NT, Hades appears as well as the lake of fire and the place where there's gnawing and nashing of teeth.

God does open up the earth and swallow nonbelievers in the OT, along with a bunch of other cruel shit, but I don't recall a place of eternal torment in the OT.

[-] phar@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I don't believe there is any part that says the serpent is supposed to be Satan

[-] GlendatheGayWitch@lib.lgbt 1 points 1 year ago

Oh that's right. It's in Revelation (new testament) that describes Satan as the serpent of old, relating back to Genesis.

[-] schwim@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

The better question to ask is why is the accompanying photo of a woman pointing 4 fingers at me?

[-] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

She is demonstrating that she is not an AI generated image.

[-] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago

Obviously, she was in the military and is not allowed to point, and must use the knife hand maneuver.

[-] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Nobody knows but it's provocative. It gets the people going.

[-] Bonehead@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

She's a graduate of the Tony Robbins School Of Public Speaking.

[-] shiveyarbles@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

If there's a god we're too insignificant for him to notice us.

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

If there's a god he made the entire universe and probably has a much nicer planet somewhere with humans v23947489 that he much prefers over us, and spends most of his time over there.

[-] ultrasquid@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

That's basically the lore of the game Ultrakill

Or just turn them to dust without destroying everything with a flood...

[-] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

That would be a hand out, which is socialism. You wouldn’t want god to be a filthy socialist now, would you? Pull yourself up by your bootstraps.

[-] marco@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago

"Multiple pastors tell me, essentially, the same story about quoting the Sermon on the Mount, parenthetically, in their preaching—'turn the other cheek'—[and] to have someone come up after to say, 'Where did you get those liberal talking points?'" Moore said.

"When the pastor would say, 'I'm literally quoting Jesus Christ' ... The response would be, 'Yes, but that doesn't work anymore. That's weak," he added. "When we get to the point where the teachings of Jesus himself are seen as subversive to us, then we're in a crisis."

https://www.newsweek.com/evangelicals-rejecting-jesus-teachings-liberal-talking-points-pastor-1818706

[-] novibe@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

The demiurge hates us. That’s why.

God is the Universe, and he loves us. He does provide, but he isn’t a being or person, he doesn’t act like that.

Everything that happens is just part of his dream.

[-] bermuda@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago
[-] novibe@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Well yeah shit do be crazy around these parts (aka the universe).

[-] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org -1 points 1 year ago

Problem: evolution wouldn't work if He did that.

Problem: if our experiments with AI are any clue, evolution is the only way to create intelligent life.

Problem: without intelligent life, the existence of the universe, and perhaps the existence of God Himself, would be pointless.

[-] Aagje_D_Vogel@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago

Ahh yes. Religion. The answer to nothing.

[-] PatFussy@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I will answer this question the same way i always answer these "why doesnt god do this" questions.

We just dont know. Maybe we are misinterpreting what god is supposed to be. Maybe god exists in a form we will never be able comprehend. Maybe god is the weak nuclear force holding all of everything together where inorganic is just as precious as organic. Maybe god is an nth dimensional being where basically nothing matters and things are created and destroyed on accident and we worship god for having such abilities. Maybe we are microscopic to god in the same way we treat bacteria. There are attempts to find god but maybe it will bever be fruitful. Maybe if we do discover evidence of god some day and it will bring the destruction of the universe itself.

Its all just games we tell ourselves to feel like someone is in control. The idea of atheism is just as pointless as theism. Its like being a hater just because you want to be a hater.

[-] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago

It may also be the case that there is no god. I have yet to see sufficient evidence supporting the existence of one.

The idea of atheism is just as pointless as theism. Its[sic] like being a hater just because you want to be a hater.

The analogy suggests there is no reason for being atheistic--for not believing in things for which no good evidence exists.

If your default position is to believe in things without evidence, one would have to somehow believe everything to be logically consistent. But believing everything means believing contradictory things which is also logically inconsistent. So one has to arbitrarily choose what to believe despite having no reason to do so or realize that believing in things with no supporting evidence isn't rational.

[-] atheist@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

It's just a rhetorical question

this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
301 points (96.6% liked)

Atheism

1537 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS