this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
123 points (98.4% liked)

politics

19656 readers
3048 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

One GOP proposal takes aim squarely at parents raising children on their own by eliminating the “head of household” filing status to reap some $200B more in taxes over a decade from single parents and other adults caring for dependents on their own.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 5 points 3 hours ago

Reminder that taxes do not fund spending. They do not need to “offset” the tax cuts by reducing benefits. They simply want to do both.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 18 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

So increase prices on the poor and then cut their benefits. Frankly, I'm here for it. Quickest way to turn your blue collar base against you is to make sure that they go hungry. Go on Trump. Give them a reason to write "Let them eat cake" in your blood.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 26 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Are you kidding? They'll blame Biden.

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

True, but at least they’ll suffer for it?

At this point, I’ve largely embraced apathy:

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 15 points 6 hours ago

More likely outcome - they'll use this to enrage the base, point them at POC, LGBTQ, non-xtians, liberals, etc...and promise them a pardon.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 15 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Nah Faux News will instruct them to think it’s Obama’s fault somehow.

[–] Redditsux@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

This is extremely cynical of them.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 11 points 6 hours ago

Cynical? It's the core plank of the Republiqan platform and always has been.

And now the broligarchs are tired of playing footsies with even pretending to care about stuff on the margins (DEI hiring, rainbow-washing, etc.) they bought donvict and now they are going to cash the fuck in. If they can smash the working class completely, and end democracy entirely, they won't even have to worry about any more pandering with the usual ragebait they need to get dumb people to vote for Republicans, either.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

You hear that, peasants? The pain you are going to feel is going to be a patriotic one, because you'll be helping to feed into the glorification of the already obscenely wealthy!

Also another big benefit and this is the one you probably are most excited about: this might harm some brown people and some libs, too, so enjoy your SHIT SANDWICH because some of the people you love to hate might have to smell it! Eat up.

[–] Yodan@lemm.ee 2 points 5 hours ago

Why do we pay taxes anymore? Wasn't that the whole reason for the tea party, people paid for what, no say or benefit?

We pay taxes for public roads, firefighters, police, military, parks, etc. If they aren't going to be used as a pool of resources to focus into infrastructure for the country then it's a crime to pay into thin air that just gives elon even more money.

[–] droporain@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 6 hours ago

I had to check to see if this was an onion article.