985
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

San Francisco’s police union says a city bakery chain has a “bigoted” policy of not serving uniformed cops.

The San Francisco Police Officers Assn. wrote in a social media post last week that Reem’s California “will not serve anyone armed and in uniform” and that includes “members of the U.S. Military.” The union is demanding that the chain “own” its policy.

Reem’s says, however, its policy isn’t against serving armed police officers. It’s against allowing guns inside its businesses.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] caboose2006@lemmy.ca 277 points 1 year ago

Last time I checked "Police Officer" wasn't a protected class you little snowflakes.

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] topinambour_rex@lemmy.world 142 points 1 year ago

It could be worse. This shop could react like police officers when someone enters a police station with a weapon.

[-] TheGoldenGod@lemmy.world 141 points 1 year ago
load more comments (14 replies)
[-] Tarkcanis@lemmy.world 116 points 1 year ago

So fucking what? Police aren't a protected class.

load more comments (18 replies)
[-] TheLurker@lemmy.world 105 points 1 year ago

Correct me if I am wrong but didn't the same people having a whinge over this make the point about how businesses have the right to choose who they serve? I believe this was a few years ago when a different bakery refused to serve gay people.

So it wasn't about the rights of business to be run without government interference afterall.

Well there is a shocker.

[-] Jaywarbs@artemis.camp 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Being gay and being a cop are not at all the same. One is a sexual orientation and one is a job. Cops chose their job.

[-] TheLurker@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think you may have misunderstood my post.

A few years ago conservatives got their back up because a bakery refused to serve gay people and reasonable people found that to be wrong.

Conservatives argued that a business has the right to choose who they serve without government interference. And this was held up in court.

Therefore those same people complaining about another bakery not serving the police is the same thing. But now the shoe is on the other foot and they are crying foul.

My post was meant to point out yet another example of hypocrisy from conservatives.

[-] ngdev@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

The point they made enhances yours. Yes it is hypocritical, but is arguably worse on the conservatives' part since sexual orientation is something you're born with.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 98 points 1 year ago

it's about the guns, not the cops

Honestly would be cooler if it were about the cops

[-] nostalgicgamerz@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

Ssshh. It definitely is wink

[-] Not_mikey@lemmy.world 89 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For some more context this place, reems, really isn't a bakery so much as a middle eastern take out place. The main store is currently closed down though so the only place they have open is a counter serve food court style place in the ferry building, so the cops didn't get kicked out of the place, they either went to the counter and the cashier refused to serve, or more likely, they saw the new policy online and threw a hissy fit without actually going.

The founder is a Palestinian leftist, so this probably was targeted towards cops/military.

I'd highly recommend going here if your on a tourist trip and end up in the ferry building, not just for the cop hate, but there wraps are great as well.

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 34 points 1 year ago
[-] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, we're so damn scary!

  • Sincerely, leftist pacifist
load more comments (13 replies)
[-] elscallr@lemmy.world 86 points 1 year ago

It's wholly within their rights to refuse service to anyone for any reason. I hope they stick to their.. well, I guess "stick to their guns" doesn't really work here but whatever.

[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 76 points 1 year ago

If they are a public facing business, they are not within their rights to refuse service to anyone for any reason. There are protected classes, like age/race/sexuality. So if you own a business like a coffee shop, you can't say "no black people." However, police and guns are not protected classes, so I think they should be in the clear legally.

[-] ZzyzxRoad@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago

What happened to the supreme court cases that said it's ok to discriminate against protected classes as long as it just so happens to be "against your religion"

[-] visak@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

"against your Christian religion". Fixed that for you.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 86 points 1 year ago

Even if it were a policy against serving cops, didn't the Supreme Court literally just rule that a business can deny any group?

If you can refuse to serve gay people, you can refuse to serve cops. This shit goes both ways.

[-] Lobotomie@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Yes because homosexuals could just leave their gay in their car amirite

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 86 points 1 year ago

Good, normalize rejecting cops.

load more comments (79 replies)
[-] rynzcycle@kbin.social 78 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

if you’re going to have policies that discriminate against one group of people, then own it, post it publicly,

...McCray said somehow without even a hint of irony.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 55 points 1 year ago

Hey now, cops aren't all bad. I mean 60% of police wouldn't be caught beating their wives.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ZzyzxRoad@lemm.ee 51 points 1 year ago

If cops want the bakery to "own" their policy, they they should own their policy of racial profiling

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

“Reem’s has a deep commitment to uplifting social and racial justice in our communities,” the statement said. “This includes fostering an environment of safety for our staff and customers. In a time of increased gun violence — particularly impacting people of color, youth, and queer people — we believe that maintaining a strict policy of prohibiting guns in our restaurant keeps us safer.”

They don’t want guns on their property. It’s pretty simple. They have the right to restrict guns on their property.

Calling them ‘bigots’ and ‘discriminatory’ is disgusting, because those words mean hating people for inherent qualities that can’t be changed, like skin colour. You can leave your gun and uniform behind and poof you magically aren’t in the ‘discriminated’ group.

Black people can’t leave their skin in their car. See the difference? No? Then you might be a bigot.

e: anonymous downvoters, don’t be a pussy, reply please. That’s the whole point of this forum. Engage or gtfo.

[-] Moyer1666@lemmy.ml 46 points 1 year ago

The police complaining about something being bigoted? Are they that blind? Or do they really only care when it effects them...

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] phej@reddthat.com 44 points 1 year ago

"Sorry, we don't support that lifestyle"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Chickenstalker@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

Even Aragorn and co had to leave their weapons to enter Edoras. Gandalf was a cheeky bugger though.

[-] bhamlin@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

If you didn't want to be a bastard, you shouldn't have been a cop.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] bdesk@kbin.social 36 points 1 year ago

Police in SF are showin up?

[-] Shush@reddthat.com 42 points 1 year ago

To eat in a bakery? Sure.

[-] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 30 points 1 year ago

Aren’t police unions among those who back politicians that fight tooth and nail for businesses to adhere to their values? I should think that Reem’s would have their full-throated support for refusing service to those who offend their beliefs. I’m so confused.

/smh

[-] reverendsteveii@sopuli.xyz 28 points 1 year ago

Well here's one civil right the cops can't easily ignore. If an undercover buys a donut is that covered by qualified immunity?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
985 points (98.2% liked)

News

23422 readers
2585 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS