301

In the court filing, Castro argues Trump violated the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which bars anyone who engaged in or provided aid or comfort to an insurrection from holding office.

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] treefrog@lemm.ee 63 points 1 year ago

Didn't MTG also provide aid and comfort? Would love to see more lawsuits like this for other traitors.

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 32 points 1 year ago

Lots of people run afoul of 14A S3, and I would expect that once any of these challenges on its basis succeeds, the moves will begin swiftly to address Trump and others in many states.

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

Lots of people run afoul of 14A S3,

Yeah, it's a habit I'm trying to break. People keep telling me that I have to watch out for 14A S3, but I just can't help occasionally committing a little light treason. 14AS3 is a constant topic around our dinner table, discussed only less than the merits of 26 U.S. Code § 36B of the US tax code.

[-] ericisshort@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Bravo. Your sarcasm’s so dry that I need a glass of water.

[-] loobkoob@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

What's a little treason among friends, eh?

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago
[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

I really love them kicking each others in the balls. I need more popcorn, STAT!

[-] zebs@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Is there any possibility that this lawsuit is an attempt to get a favourable (to the republican party) ruling (that Trump can stand) by presenting a poor case and therefore blocking a properly prepared and presented case on the basis that it has already been ruled on?

[-] PeleSpirit@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I see what you're saying but he's only running in the swing states so it messes with Trump's chances. He's definitely an anti-trumper, imo.

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

They're not smart enough to do that.

My guess is that they'll try to get it tossed on the grounds that he's also running for President and this is a conflict of interest.

I think a lawsuit like this would have a much better chance of success if it were being filed by a secretary of state, an AG, or some other offical that doesn't have direct skin in the game.

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Doesn't that show he's actively being damaged by Trump's running tho and this has standing? The recourse he's asking for is directly in line with that reasoning.

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I didn't say it would make sense. I'm just saying that's what they're probably going to go with.

[-] TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

Three GOP is a joke

this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
301 points (98.7% liked)

politics

18852 readers
5153 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS