this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
136 points (97.2% liked)

xkcd

9638 readers
179 users here now

A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Briefly set a new record for tallest human-made structure by getting my knit sweater snagged on the skydiving plane door as I jumped and not noticing until I'd landed.

https://explainxkcd.com/3058/

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How big would that sweater have to be?

[–] notabot@lemm.ee 21 points 4 days ago

From what I can find, an average sweater uses between 3-6000 feet of yarn [1]. Apparently an 'ideal' altitude for for skydiving is 14000 feet [2]. That puts you around the same altitude as high altitude aerostat radar systems[3]. It would have to be a fairly voluminous sweater, but it's probably just about within the realms of possibility. It's chilly at that altitude, so maybe it was made with several layers for extra warmth?

I'm no wool-ologist, and even less of a jumper out of planes, but these were the sources I used to get my figures:

[1] https://www.blackeryarns.co.uk/advice-information/wool-ball-lengths/ [2] https://friendlyskydiver.com/skydiving-altitudes/ [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tethered_Aerostat_Radar_System

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If an unraveling sweater counts as a "tall structure", then what about the space tether, where NASA used a 20 km long wire?

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 8 points 4 days ago

The comic lists tall structures existing in this moment. Aside from not starting at ground level, as an experiment, the space tether does not persist until today.

[–] Novamdomum@fedia.io 6 points 4 days ago (2 children)

One of these things is not like the others.

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The Great Pyramid in Giza, as it is really old?

[–] sxan@midwest.social 2 points 4 days ago

All of needs is a qualifier. "Permanent" or some appropriate synonym would work. Also, "structure" is probably technically true, but not colloquially, common-usage true.

But: it's a comic. XKCD's main failing is that it's mostly a serious, science-based unless it's being outright silly, which triggers the pendant in us. Or, in some of us. My defense mechanism is that Randall is far, far more educated about these things, and I immediately fell stupid for being pedantic; like how you might feel when you find yourself criticizing the phrasing of a sentance in "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies".

I'll be in the cold cold ground before I recognize an infographic of buildings with no pickle