this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2025
404 points (95.5% liked)

/r/50501 Mirror

761 readers
1003 users here now


Mirrored /r/50501 Popular Posts


founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 

Time to break free of traditional political ideological labeling and divisions. Time to abandon old, divisive sociopolitical labels like "liberal" and "conservative".

A new political party based on a vastly, commonly held virtures lends itself to embrace over 66% of Americans, and it clearly embraces progressive principled thinking. In the most ideal American sense of unity, a political party should not be able to be defined or placed as "to the left" or "to the right" of where the Democratic or Republican parties currently are. Just let it exist organically based on present-day principled thinking. The American Progressive Majority.


Originally Posted By u/Atlanticbboy At 2025-03-23 04:38:18 AM | Source


top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Ok but now is not a good time to disarm

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The working class must never disarm. Post jan 6th and George floydd and people still have yet to learn that no one will protect us but ourselves. How delusional of me to think anything will ever drive this point home in people's frightened minds.

It would be nice to have some reforms, but that's not what anti gun people want. They want everything. We could pass reforms and somebody will shoot up some gun free zone and people will be back to take more. It's a never ending circle that only stops at fully stripping the right to own a firearm completely. Some aren't even ashamed to admit it.

My body, my choice in how to protect it. Prisons are gun free, prisoners have very few rights. Yet rape / violence in prisons are a running joke everyone enjoys repeating. I will not be a prisoner.

Good luck to OP with their party but I want no part of it. Plus they aren't in favor of legalizing all drugs so you support the police state's right to continue to ruin lives and shoot people for fun with no repercussions. Not to mention the lives lost from tainted unregulated drugs of a unknown potency. Oh and nothing on replacing First-past-the-post voting so we can have more then two parties? Super hard pass. We'd only be 3-4 generations before the capitalist class captures this political party as well. If not less.

If only we could join a commune that best reflects each of our values. OP could be completely unarmed in their commune and mine would have nukes cause humans are psychotic hairless apes that only respect one thing. Overwhelming violence.

SocialistRA.org

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com 27 points 2 weeks ago (26 children)

it's wild that only 55% of you guys want a fairer health care system

[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 11 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

It’s because the phrase “Medicare for all” has been propagandized. If you instead asked if people wanted “affordable medical treatment and preventative care for themselves and others”, I’m sure that number would be much higher.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Two things.

One, I would get a gun and find a trustworthy community if I were a leftist or minority American.

As much as I despise guns, if shit gets Gilead bad, you'll probably be happy to have it.

As for community, if you don't have one yet, I would recommend joining either a socialist club or a progressive/traditional (i.e. not racist) Christian church. A black church (think MLK), or a pride flag flying liberal Church (think John Brown).

When Nazi's invaded my country, these were the two communities that actually resisted, by fighting back and helping people hide and escape. In times of slavery, socialism wasn't yet a thing, so the abolitionists and underground railroad people were progressive Christians. Jesus was the OG socialist and these communities live it.

[–] dditty@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago

Totally agree, and fucking thank you for the shout out about progressive Christians! Underground railroad, temperance movement, anti-war protests, civil rights, etc, progressive Christians have always been a driving force for good and that has totally gotten overshadowed by the evil of white evangelicals in recent years

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)
[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Thanks for sharing.

I just want to say one thing though. With drones, guns are no longer the big equalizers that they used to be.

If you ever get in a standoff with government fascists, they will just use drones.

I saw the videos of how Azerbeidzjan just totally obliterated heavily armed Armenian positions using Bayraktar drones.

This shit is scary as fuck. I wouldn't be surprised if, within 25 years from now, 90% of the world is living under authoritarian regimes.

Which is why I think being part of a very large community with solidarity among all members will be key.

Any small group will just be labeled as terrorists and obliterated.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago

70% couldn't ve bothered voting knowing it meant democracy's end

Good intentions are important Americans, but you cannot make the world a better place just by having good intentions and navel gazing

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Clearly people aren't voting the same way they're answering surveys. I don't see how forming a new party will make that happen.

[–] Ronno@feddit.nl 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, I observe the same thing here in The Netherlands. In theory, democracy should work best for the working class majority. In practice, people somehow tend to vote for something not in their own self interest.

Wonderful example is the area where I live, our town shares a border with a Belgian town. Most people do groceries on one side of the border, go to the bar on the other side. In essence, we operate as one town that happens to be in two countries. Ask anyone in the street if they are open to a "Nexit" from the EU, most will say a hard: "No".

Then look at the election results, the party in favor of a Nexit became the largest party, also in the town I live. It's wild that people vote different to what they believe in. If you then ask them: why did you vote for this party, because it contrasts your earlier answer. People will say: "Yeah, but it won't come to that". Then I look at Brexit and it's exactly how that cluster fuck happened.

My brain simply cannot process this idiocracy.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Only a little more than half support Medicare for all? Is this a terminology issue, or are 45% of Americans that terrible?

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 16 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Sadly there's this idea that Americans are being taxed to death, when in reality not so much.

People don't understand that while we'd pay maybe hundreds more in taxes to fund Single Payer, we'd pay THOUSANDS less in healthcare costs, so we still come out ahead

[–] DarthKaren@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They also don't understand the "they" part. People who don't support, or at least those I've met, don't understand that "they" doesn't mean the government per se. It means you. The individual. You pay more in health care because of defaults on payments. Because of so many other things. The cost of that gets passed on to you. The individual.

People get stuck in the "I got mine" mentality. They don't see the bigger picture. "Why should I pay for someone else's health care!" is what I commonly hear. My dude, you already do. When you point this out. When you give the stats. They usually shut down and it's"

10 "Why should I pay for someone else's health care!"

20 goto 10

People just can't seem to grasp the wider picture. I'm not sure they want to. Any issue that requires a wider picture sees the same response. Default to previous operation. Repeat operation.

"Oh no! She's stuck in an infinite loop and he's too stupid to realize it." - Professor F

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

These numbers are bullshit.

Who in their right mind actually believes Americans prefer gun control to: abortion care, legal weed, gay marriage, higher minimum wage, and home ownership.

Like regardless of what you or I want for America, that's an actual load of shit. Too many people love their guns, there's literally more guns than people here.

[–] stickly@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There are more guns than people because people that own guns own multiple. And people that own a lot of guns own a loooot of guns. 29% of gun owners own five or more guns. It takes like 2 seconds to confirm this shit...

[–] magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (9 children)

Nearly half of all American households have a gun. 44% to be exact.

If even a third of everyone in those households didn't want gun control (33% of 44% is a little over 14.5% total), then that statistic is wrong.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Xatolos@reddthat.com 7 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Too many people love their guns, there's literally more guns than people here.

Loving their guns and wanting better gun control laws aren't two opposite things you know. They can easily go hand in hand. See Canada to the north. Lots of guns, and better gun control laws.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Nunar@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

AOC and Bernie are tearing up things! Support them everywhere! Especially on social media.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] arotrios@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

This is a better platform than the Dems provided in 2024. Upvoted and cross-posted.

[–] 96VXb9ktTjFnRi@feddit.nl 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I think you need to somehow get money out of politics or these majorities will continue to be divided.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Necroscope0@lemm.ee 10 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Our entire US system is set up to make it so that it is essentially (literally) impossible for a third party to win. This article gives a decent basic overview of why: https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/4947662-why-a-third-party-presidential-candidate-can-never-win/

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] The_Caretaker@lemm.ee 9 points 2 weeks ago

The current two party system doesn't represent what the majority wants. Both parties work for the super wealthy. Until we get rid of the Democratic and Republican parties nothing good will happen.

[–] Axiochus@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's not how you cite a source - the point of a citation is to allow the reader to trace, and evaluate, the source of a claim, and the methodology used to arrive there. I get that it's impractical to do a full bibliography, but the way this poster just 'cites' a bunch of organizations without tracing specific claims to specific publications detracts from the argument. We should be better than the enemy who make claims and respond with "do your own research" when challenged. Part of the reason why we're in this mess is because we stopped supporting, or trusting, the process behind evidence-based science. If we make these claims, can't we link to a site that lists the actual papers behind the claims? Otherwise this whole stuff is vulnerable to the argument that "this is a radical left delusion and fake news". Fascist propaganda shouldn't be resisted in kind, that just drags us down to their level.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] i_am_hiding@aussie.zone 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Be all that as it may, but sweet fuck all percent of you actually vote, so what difference will it make?

[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (7 children)

I have been having arguments with idiots telling me "not voting isn't inaction" or "the lesser of two evils" is how we got to where we are now

No. Not voting is literally doing nothing. You are helping their voter suppression efforts. And we got here not because of "the lesser evil" getting worse over time but because historically we only have 40-50% voter turnout for the last few decades.

Democrats have shifted more conservative because progressives hardly vote. I say that as a progressive. If it wasn't true then Bernie would have won the primary, but he had a ton of support from young voters and then younger voters only had like 10-15% turnout.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 9 points 2 weeks ago (12 children)

Then why didn't they fucking vote for it?

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Willllooooow@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I don't believe e any of these numbers.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] oxysis@lemm.ee 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I’m sad that trans rights aren’t on the list there, not surprised with how awful things are but still sad

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Rin@lemm.ee 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] elatedCatfish@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I agree with almost all of these but some of these numbers were definitely pulled out of someone’s ass

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago (17 children)

90% of the US don't want more gun control laws. As a percentage that would be saying that every state in the US except Texas wants more gun laws ... it's not right.

I consider myself liberal, but would never support taking away someone's rights. Own all the guns and even a fucking tank if you want ... but you will go to jail if you harm someone with them.

We were given the right to have firearms for the exact situation that is happening now.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] vvilld@50501.chat 6 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

I appreciate and agree with the sentiment, but I think a call to form an entirely new political party demonstrates a naivety with regards to how the American political system works. It's just not going to happen. A third party will NEVER displace one of the two major parties without massive changes to the electoral system that would likely require a Constitutional Amendment.

Our system and political culture is just not structured to allow for 3rd parties. What's more, the 2 major parties have ingrained themselves into the system so much that they have MASSIVE institutional advantages over a 3rd party.

This will never be a successful effort. I think a better goal would be to co-opt and take over the Democratic Party, booting out all the Vichy collaborationists like Schumer, Jefferies, Newsom, Adams, Pelosi, etc, and remaking the party.

With a new 3rd party, best case scenario is it has 0 impact. If it does get any votes, it'll just divide the anti-fascist vote with the Democrats (and any other 3rd parties) making it even more difficult to win.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago (22 children)

"Democracy will just never work, the king won't allow it"

load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Wireproof@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

If that's true why did the majority let the minority lead the way, are they dumb?

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago

If you just vote for the individual policies we say we want in this poll, then you're throwing your vote away!

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yes. Americans are fucking stupid.

The RNC and GOP claim to hold every position on every stance and talk about outcomes which will never come from the policies they actually write. The American Public doesn't know jack shit about policies or vote history.

So the GOP consistently outnumber the DNC every year for over 10 years. Even when DNC pick majority leader it has been because of caucusing Independents.

You can just keep winning if you just keep lying.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Drop the anti-gun arguments; they aren't based on reality.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›