this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
26 points (90.6% liked)

Movies

8789 readers
124 users here now

Lemmy

Welcome to Movies, a community for discussing movies, film news, box office, and more! We want this to be a place for members to feel safe to discuss and share everything they love about movies and movie related things. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow!


Related Communities:

!books@lemmy.world - Discussing books and book-related things.

!comicbooks@lemmy.world - A place to discuss comic books of all types.

!marvelstudios@lemmy.world - LW's home for all things MCU.


While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

  1. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed

  4. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.

    Regarding spoilers; Please put "(Spoilers)" in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers, as we do not currently have a spoiler tag available. If your post contains an image that could be considered a spoiler, please mark the thread as NSFW so the image gets blurred. As far as how long to wait until the post is no longer a spoiler, please just use your best judgement. Everyone has a different idea on this, so we don't want to make any hard limits.

    Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread. Most of the Lemmy clients don't support this but we want to get into the habit as clients will be supporting in the future.

Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ben Affleck thinks his and Zack Snyder's take on Batman skewed "too old" and mature to appeal to younger viewers and comic book fans.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee 32 points 1 week ago

i think the real problem was the lackluster movies

[–] MummifiedClient5000@feddit.dk 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yup. No acclaimed comic books featuring an old Batman exist, so that must be it.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Well there is no acclaimed movie featuring old Batman.

https://m.imdb.com/title/tt2313197/

Ignore the link, totally irrelevant

[–] falidorn@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

The writing and directing was the problem. Should have never hired that fraud to make anything with a budget.

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 16 points 1 week ago

The studio has no idea how to make a DC movie. That's the issue. They don't care about writing or direction, so it doesn't matter who the movie is aimed at because it's going to be bad regardless.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago

Nah, the entire DC justice league felt shallow. It was as if they were just going through a checklist of everything they thought would make a good DC film.

They had something with man of steel, after that it was all downhill.

[–] ReluctantZen@feddit.nl 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Eh, not really. A jaded, older and experienced Batman was a nice change to me at the time, who was a young comic book fan. I quite liked their take (still do).

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Me too. I didn't mind Batfleck at all. And I like the costume from Justice League, with the bits of gold like the brass knuckles on his gloves.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

But the Nolan trilogy didn't? 🤔

[–] Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Batman is such a weird superhero. Because he literally lives out a fantasy of a billionaire dressing up in a costume to beat the shit out of poor people

[–] River_Tahm@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago

Wayne and Stark are kinda both “what if billionaires decided to be good people” which seems to appeal to the American dream even if not the American reality

Though admittedly, they’re both likely less impactful as vigilantes spending millions on personal weapons tech than they would be if they like… solved world hunger or something.

…And even in a fictional universe with super powers we still can’t imagine billionaires even trying to be good without suffering through severe trauma first.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

TIL mobsters are poor people.

Mobsters deffinatly employ poor and desperate people

[–] MisterMoo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

It also starred Ben Affleck.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

People don't have the time, money, or safety to go to the movies anymore.

I don't care enough about the 50th batman movie to pay $15 for popcorn and then get shot

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Should have had a demon annul his marriage to his wife so he could move back in with his aunt.

That really appeals to the youngsters.

[–] fieryhamster@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Bigger problem: Oligarchy worship with rich person venerated as hero.

[–] SineSwiper@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's a reductive take. Batman has always been on the side of the poor and common man, despite his wealth. One could point out the obvious "rich savoir" angle, but I think that far less problematic.

[–] fieryhamster@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Doesn’t negate my viewpoint and reinforces it. There is a reason so many idiots fell for Musk and Trump.