Just think of how much money they can make by selling ham frequencies...
this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2025
21 points (100.0% liked)
Amateur Radio
1373 readers
11 users here now
General amateur radio (ham radio) chat, questions, and news
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
That's what I warned everyone about during our weekly net. We're tiny fish compared to the telecom giants. Everything above 6 meters is in jeopardy.
I'd wonder if the existing amateur presence would make the bands hard to sell for "pollution risk". There's a lot of kit in circulation, and getting it off the market, including secondhand, would be difficult.
Yeah, they could blow a lot of time and money on FCC enforcement, but it feels like trying to unring a bell. As a telecom, would you be willing to pay for (for example) 148MHz on just the promise the existing users were displaced on paper? That doesn't mean much when some untrained/curious person finds kit at the Goodwill and tries it out in the middle of your service range.
Of course, obviously fight for every nanometre of spectrum, but that's probably a legit argument against reclassification: all they'd get is damaged goods of low resale value.
Like most dictatorships they'll just start executing people who use the band. Problem solved.
According to the OMs in our area, real ham radio is HF. So we're good.
Get rid of the baud rate limits on VHF and 70cm.
So what are people writing about? Please share your comments and thoughts.
The ARRL post leaves a lot to be desired; I tried to capture the most basic information about this here:
@BenDoubleU@lemmy.radio what's going on in this article? is it DOGE nonsense?