EA now being a model to aspire to?! What next? Cats chasing dogs? Sunshine at midnight? America showing responsible global leadership? nVidia making a fairly priced GPU?
HakFoo
Some people like to use a stored balance as a financial discipline tool. Don't put a "real" funding source on the account and then you can only spend the $100 you committed to, and not go whale-mad and drop $500 on premium currencies.
It's easier just to price in the fee than having to shut down or retool a project.
The problem with attribution is the difficulty of 1000% accurate compliance.
If you grab 100 lines of code from a repository, or five paragraphs from a story, there's probably a claim there. If you grab a single word, there's probably not. But in the middle, there's a paralysis of uncertainty-- is n lines similar enough to create liability? Can you remember where you saw what reliably? You end up with a bias towards "over-attribution" and it becomes difficult to pare it back. Does everything need a full Git-style commit history? Are we forever stuck keeping a credit on a project because it's difficult to prove you've fully scrubbed their contributions?
Focus on how we pay artists (ideally lush grants) and forget about credit. Maybe establish a culture where it's voluntary and acceptable-- that people feel that they're allowed to cite their raw materials, and reuse doesn't make the work lesser-- but don't try to use the courts to force people to try to remember and track where they saw something when they just want to create, or it creates a hostile environment.
Hey, the broken clock's right!
IP law always had a built-in scale pronlem. Without a registration-required copyright model, and probably some sort of mandatory licensing rate system, the sheer logistics of finding and arranging rights made a lot of business models inpractical. (For example, why aren't modern bookstores just print-on-demand kiosks, or streaming services have All The Content? In large part because it would cost thousands to track down owners and negotiate terms for $1.87 in royalties multiplied by every item in the catalog.)
This was ignorable for a long time, or even a commercial advantage for firms with access to large, pre-negotiated catalogs. The AI boom created a surprise market of non-incumbents who need to get access to a lot of IP in a streamlined manner.
If we open the door for bulk IP clearance to grant the AI bubble a stro ger legal footing, it can also allow other, potentially more interesting business ideas to slip through.
I'm concerned at that quota. If you only measure in terms of units produced, where's the metrics for quality?
I figure it would be the "good enough compliance gesture" like when router makers dunp a barely-building code sample to comply with the GPL.
Wouldn't the easiest way out for this just be to throw a repo up and say "host your own servers, go away."
It feels like that would be an approach that would be simple and cheap to deliver (they don't have to handhold any of it) but makes them look magnamanous-- "you'll be able to show your kids this game or get a nostalgia kick even 20 years for now, like how your dad pulled out the Atari 2600".
It's impressive how much of the recent deportation scheme leans on the cooperation of one tin-pot state.
There aren't that many other places with concentration camps conveninently located and leadership ready to deal. It's unlikely they'd build them domestically, it would take time, cost a fortune, and not achieve the explicit "we removed the evil foreigners" goal.
It would be interesting to see what happened if someone said "we'll pay you more than what America is paying to close the door." Would he have to just knock on every presidential palace in the hemisphere looking for a new partner? Try to scale Guantanamo 100x overnight?
The sacred rituals of Western civilization-- the election and the press-- were long ago subsumed by capital. You don't need to formally censor when the oligarchs own the media and will skew the messaging to serve their interest. You don't need to have a single party state when the Overton window has been dragged so far right that no electoral outcome can actually oust billionaire rule.
At least, in that context, we can ask who censorship serves? Is it about social cohesion and stability, or preserving the privilege of a handful of people?
I wish it had four buttons. I use the back/forward buttons enough to justify the Expert Mouse, but the scroll wheel broke down and I eventually switched to an Adesso T50, then a HUGE.
If you have the chance, check out the Computer History Museum in Mountain View, California.
The DEC PDP-1 and IBM 1401 exhibits would both fit the aesthetic pretty well.